Talk:Polar forests of the Cretaceous

On 20 September 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved to Polar forest. The result of the discussion was not moved.

Geology Mid‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Polar forests of the Cretaceous is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ecology Low‑importance

	Ecology portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Ecology, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve ecology-related articles.EcologyWikipedia:WikiProject EcologyTemplate:WikiProject EcologyEcology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Antarctica Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Antarctica, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Antarctica on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AntarcticaWikipedia:WikiProject AntarcticaTemplate:WikiProject AntarcticaAntarctica articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Arctic Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arctic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Arctic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArcticWikipedia:WikiProject ArcticTemplate:WikiProject ArcticArctic articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ecoregions and Time

I was considering whether it was sensible to try and add Template:Infobox_ecoregion or something similar to this article, and then it occurred to me that 'ecoregions' will have changed over geological time due to plate tectonics so listing them by 'country' is probably not going to make much sense, so perhaps latitude and longitude and extent make more sense? Perhaps listing the countries that those land masses now lie in might be interesting too ? I guess that would need a new template. EdwardLane (talk) 10:09, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Eocene polar forests

There were also polar forests in the Eocene, possibly constantly since the Cretaceous. Wouldn't it makes more sense to rename this article to Polar forests, and have sections for each era?

Also, the introduction line "During the Cretaceous Terrestrial Revolution, conifers, cycads and ferns were selectively replaced by angiosperms and gymnosperms" is contradictory, as conifers are gymnosperms. Fig (talk) 22:44, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

sounds reasonable to me , holocene seems likely to the best described. EdwardLane (talk) 11:25, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification needed

So the higher (temperate) latitudes were really more productive than the lower (tropical) ones? That's not a mistake? The statement is unexpected and counterintuitive, as in our own period the warmer tropical latitudes are in general the most productive regions, but the text fails to acknowledge that.

Also, how did the plants cope with five months of darkness? That sounds like a pretty extreme condition. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 20:47, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 20 September 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 12:24, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Polar forests of the Cretaceous → Polar forest – This has always seemed like a somewhat nebulous topic and article title. There is no doubt in my mind that the topic of "polar forest" is probably notable, but it seems strange to confine coverage of the topic solely to the Cretaceous period, when polars forests have existed for large streches of earth's history both before and after the Cretaceous. I intend to heavily rewrite the article if the move request goes through. Hemiauchenia (talk) 20:35, 20 September 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. Adumbrativus (talk) 08:39, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Strong oppose Instead create a new article on polar forest in general, and leave this one focused on what it is now, -- 67.70.25.175 (talk) 06:00, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As the IP said, a new all-encompassing article should be created instead of modifying the scope of this one. This one can be merged into it later if necessary. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 09:02, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.