Talk:Postdoctoral researcher

Archives

2004–2011

Out of Date flag, 2022

The section on jobs cited data from 2015, so I added a note from an article in Science.org, but this is not my area of expertise. The section would benefit from a significant update from someone knowledgable. CheersAnyMouse (talk) 23:28, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Article title

I don't think that "Postdoctoral research" is an appropriate title for this article, since it is about the position rather than the research itself. I see the point that "Postdoctoral scholar" is mostly used in the humanities. The recent National Academies report uses "Postdoctoral researcher"; perhaps this is a good title? Antony–22 (^talk⁄_contribs) 01:22, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure why the current article name is "inappropriate". To be honest I'd say there is no difference in naming Postdoctoral research or Postdoctoral researcher; both reflect the content accurately as they are intrinsically linked. The problem however with the later can be that we may end up with tautological clumsiness in the lead à la ′A Postdoctoral researcher is a researcher who conducts postdoctoral research.′ Surly we'd like to avoid this. Mootros (talk) 04:44, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's important to be precise in our article titles. Awkwardness is not inevitable; an alternate lead sentence might be "A postdoctoral researcher is a person conducting academic research after the completion of their doctoral studies as part of a temporary appointment." Antony–22 (^talk⁄_contribs) 23:52, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Postdoctoral researcher. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120323153949/http://www.sigmaxi.org/postdoc/highlights.pdf to http://www.sigmaxi.org/postdoc/highlights.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:58, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 01 April 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. (non-admin closure) — Music1201 ^talk 03:51, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Postdoctoral researcher → Postdoc – more general and more common name; not all postdocs are researchers, see https://postdocs.cornell.edu/structure-postdoctoral-study – Espoo (talk) 22:01, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Moved from RMTR speedy move

Object to RMTR speedy move I think we should discuss the scope of the article then, should postdoc include all postdoctoral studies students, just postdoctoral researchers, just postdoctoral fellows, etc -- 70.51.46.39 (talk) 04:47, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Philg88 ^♦talk 05:03, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose sounds like an abbreviation. In ictu oculi (talk) 12:10, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - definitely a colloquialism and an abbreviation. Insert CleverPhrase Here 08:59, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nearly all postdoctoral positions are exclusively or predominantly research positions. Although there are postdoctoral teaching fellowships, they are much rarer than the research type. These teaching fellowships might be better discussed in a different article, as the scope of this article has always been focused on research, rather than any of the other various things one can do in academia after receiving a Ph.D. Antony–22 (^talk⁄_contribs) 18:43, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Jargon is not suitable for use as the title of an encylopaedia article. RGloucester — ☎ 21:23, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Strongly oppose. Wikipedia should favour full names which are clear and informative names. Mimi 822 453 233 (talk) 20:40, 4 April 2016 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Postdoctoral researcher. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:08, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Reference

The article also exist in the web, "Link:https://www.nature.com/articles/520144a", "Citation:Powell, K. The future of the postdoc. Nature 520, 144–147 (2015).", but I don't want to mess up when editing since my device is laggy. 136.158.11.108 (talk) 02:46, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]