Talk:Pretty Persuasion

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Teen film?

Pretty Persuasion is not a teen film according to wikipedia's definition of such, "This is a list of "teen films," movies centering around the lives of teenagers, with teens as the target audience." This film adresses bestiality, anal sex, group sex, drug use, and racism, earning it a well deserved "R" title. While it does center around the lives of teenagers, its target audience is much more adult oriented then "teen films" implies.

I agree, and have removed the "teen" from the discription. It is a very hard core satire. Most teens do not get the very strong David Mamet theme that runs through. Even the diaglogue is a satire of Mamet.68.88.13.169 21:19, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edited "somewhat became massively popular" to read "brief exposure". Oxymorons make me cry. GodHead 23:47, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Postmodern?

After watching this film, i ask myself: Is this what is often called post-modern? The interplay of truth-possibilities, the twisting of the story, the artificiality of life? -- ExpImp^talkcon 01:47, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Quotes

i will later move them to wikiquotes.

“

we will not tolerate racial slurs at roxbury. while you can use them at any other time, at home, at the mall, at rock and roll concerts, but when you are under my roof, you will respect the heritage of every student and faculty member. Do I make myself clear?

”

--Headmaster

“

ahem, i have actually been thinking... pff.. how gonna put this tactfully. Barry, i never really liked you all that much and i think we should break up.

”

--Kimberly

“

Randa: I would like to be a doctor, because i think it is a good thing to help society. I want especially to help the poor.

Kimberly: Okay, Randa that's really sweet, but in America doctors don't help the poor. And i hope you are not implying that actresses don't help society, because they often attend charity events and appear in films that have important social messages.

Randa: I'm sorry, i didn't mean to.

Kimberly: It's okay. I just hope that me and Britney can persuade you to change your mind - Being a doctor requires an awful lot of schooling. while, as the wonderful thing about being an actress is, you don't have to study at all. All it takes is talent, determination - and sleeping with some people who you otherwise wouldn't.

Britney: And the Edge.

Kimberly: Yes. Britney and I often talk about the Edge. You see, unfortunately we are not the only aspiring actresses in this town. It's full to the brim with competition, most of whom are equally talented, equally as beautiful and equally as promiscuous. So you need something to separate yourself from the pack. You need the Edge.

”

comedy

the film is not a comedy, I'm sure. it starts like one, but then the film makes a 180° turning in the very end. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 89.52.138.34 (talk) 10:40, 22 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Agreed, black comedy and satire probably need reliable sources. It is obviously social commentary with some dark humour and exaggerates various characters. We gotta go fetch dem critics views. Alastair Haines (talk) 06:18, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:JanePrettyPersuasion.jpg

Image:JanePrettyPersuasion.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:39, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Pretty Persuasion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070428053740/http://www.movienet.com:80/prettypersuasion.html to http://www.movienet.com/prettypersuasion.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:41, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Pretty Persuasion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050310102438/http://www.citybeat.com/2005-02-02/film.shtml to http://www.citybeat.com/2005-02-02/film.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:53, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]