Talk:Project Manager Mission Command

Military history: North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Maryland Low‑importance

	Maryland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maryland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Maryland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MarylandWikipedia:WikiProject MarylandTemplate:WikiProject MarylandMaryland
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article issues

I just found this article and I'm going to try and clean it up some. To start I added the current logo. However, I noticed that there are multiple issues tags on the page, but nothing here in the talk page. If no one is able to point me to an archive or defend the tags, I'll be removing them. I'm not a fan of making a page look bad by adding issues without justifying them on the talk page. If there are no arguments against removing the tags, I'll likely pull them later this week. JMcGowan2 (talk) 19:13, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The lead paragraph lists "fires" as a product line. What does "fires" actually mean? I'm guessing this is jargon referring to something other than building a campfire. Folklore1 (talk) 16:39, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fires is Army jargon referring to Field Artillery and related fields. Would adding a parenthetical reference after the words 'fires' help clear it up? JMcGowan2 (talk) 14:36, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]