Talk:Psychiatric Solutions

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Start‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Start This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Medicine: Psychiatry Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Psychiatry portal This article is supported by the Psychiatry task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Tennessee Low‑importance

	Tennessee portal Psychiatric Solutions is within the scope of WikiProject Tennessee, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of Tennessee and related subjects in the Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, and even become a member. [Project Articles] • [Project Page] • [Project Talk] • [Assessment] • [Template Usage]TennesseeWikipedia:WikiProject TennesseeTemplate:WikiProject TennesseeTennessee articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Please do not tag this article as POV before you have assessed the article for recent changes that have been made.

IP Address tried to blank page[edit]

Beware: the IP address/user "173.170.92.152" tried to blank the Manatee Palms Youth Services page. IP address is from Bradenton (where Manatee Palms is) (found out via IP geolocation). Probably MPYS/PSI trying to delete the bad wikipedia entry. Advised for constant monitoring. Tkfy7cf (talk) 01:43, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

POV[edit]

I've flagged this article for POV concern, because the vast majority of the article deals with various allegations of abuse and misconduct. See also Talk:Manatee Palms Youth Services#POV, which is related. cmadler (talk) 17:35, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I remain concerned about the neutrality of this article. I have looked at all the recent changes and reconsidered, but I still think it has issues. Much of the article deals with various allegations of misconduct. Most (though certainly not all) of the allegations relate to specific individual hospitals that are currently owned by the company, rather than to the company as a whole. This company currently owns 90 hospitals, and detailing out every problem at every hospital doesn't present a fair view of the company. However, problems at the corporate level, including widespread care issues are definitely appropriate. This would include the DOJ investigation, the statement about PSI using 1/3 fewer staff per bed and the problems that can cause, and possibly the shareholder lawsuit. I'm going to try to help the article along a bit in this regard, and not put a POV flag back on it, but I'm still concerned about the picture it paints of this company. cmadler (talk) 20:44, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ten years after comments were left on this talk page, I have updated with verifiable content. I came across this article after working on a BLP, who worked on the series of stories about this company. As I looked at this article, I found inaccurate content, in one instance, citing the Washington Post as reporting, with the reference to a different news organization, that didn't even cite WAPO. Hopefully, I haven't stepped on anyone's toes, but I felt that I should edit this article by adding credible and sourced information.Mollifiednow (talk) 17:56, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]