This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
I've removed the sources being used for the statement, "it is currently owned by Pueblo City Park." for one simple reason: the sources say nothing about the present ownership of the carousel. One notes that it was purchased by a city-related park district, but that was decades ago, and no source is presented to say that the current Pueblo City Park is the successor of the old park district. If we had a source saying that the carousel had never changed ownership since that time, we could reasonably say that it was currently owned by the city, since a park district is part of the city; but without any sources, we can't properly say that. Hell in a Bucket says "Carousel article covers this. You just have to read it and use common sense" in adding these sources; but if we have sources saying one thing and we derive something else from that statement that's not in the statement, that's a type of synthesis that is prohibited by our no-original-research policy. Nyttend (talk) 23:41, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
