Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:RENAMO

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Numbers

[edit]

Need numbers of people killed or maimed by RENAMO forces during this militia's years of activity. Why is this not already in the article? Badagnani (talk) 01:18, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

United States

[edit]

This source states that the United States provided support to RENAMO. Badagnani (talk) 20:05, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

insufficient information

[edit]

"In the United States, the CIA and conservative lobbied for support to RENAMO, which was strongly resisted by the State Department which would "not recognize or negotiate with RENAMO".[2][3][4] The British government under Margaret Thatcher did not view the civil war in Mozambique as a part of the Cold War in the extent that could have been thought and when FRELIMO closed the border to Rhodesia it was in fit well with British interests against the rebel colony while the Rhodesian government supported RENAMO.

FRELIMO also forced Mugabe to accept the Lancaster House Agreement for the end to the war in Rhodesia.[5]"

This all needs some contextualisation, and explanation, if it is to stay in - why wouldn't the state department negotiat with RENAMO? What relevance is the thatcher sentence?

And the last sentence is about Frelimo while this article is about RENAMO - this may be relevant, but it needs explanation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iamsorandom (talkcontribs) 22:16, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kidnappings

[edit]

I came to this article to find information on the Renamo kidnappings and forced militarization of children, but surprisingly its not even mentioned. A Google search turned up many references: books, articles, even documentaries. This article seems to treat them as a valid political party which, while I understand the article must remain neutral, seems to be decpeptive.Sheriffjt (talk) 02:56, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This article is barely more than a stub, so feel free to add referenced content you come across. Greenman (talk) 11:02, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is it acceptable to just reference the already existing article on the Mozambique Civil War, given it has a subsection on RENAMO atrocities?Sheriffjt (talk) 18:42, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on RENAMO. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:28, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on RENAMO. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:23, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on RENAMO. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:46, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]