Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:Radical Women

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

“Strong Stance”

[edit]

“In addition to their core feminist beliefs, they take a strong stance on racism and gay rights.”

What stance do they take?—Rory 17:50, Aug 21, 2004 (UTC)

"Nice edit"

[edit]

Nice edit, Doctor Matt. If you'd like to point out specific area you think improvement, I'll do my best to comply.--HG, 3/15/07

Merle Woo reference

[edit]

Since the Merle Woo mention already links to the Wikipedia article about her, I thought the extra reference that was supplied (which is available in the Woo article) made the sentence a bit awkward. It's here if someone feels really strongly about it needing to be there: <ref>Merle Woo, Matt & Andrej Koymasky.</ref> - Jlandahl 20:10, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

[edit]

I think this article reads like an op-ed piece in favor of the organization. Whoever wrote it clearly wants everyone to know how great Radical Women is. I am going to be working on cleaning up the severe tone problems when I get time. ausa کui × 21:10, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clarifying, Ryan. If you could be even more specific, I could help fix the article. Thanks. Doctormatt 03:25, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Since you've not responded, and not made any edits to the article, I removed the tag. The article seems pretty good to me, tone-wise. It mostly states what RW states, and it is clear that this is RW's opinion. There are quite a few citations (for the length of the article). If you still have things to say about the tone of the article, I'd love to hear them. Doctormatt 21:51, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Radical Women. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:32, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]