Talk:Ragnar Skancke

	Norway portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Military history: World War II B‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

B

This article has been rated as B-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	World War II task force

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group.

Untitled

I'm removing the statement about the postwar trials being considered a miscarriage of justice. It carries no source & it's ambiguous—it might mean the postwar trials in Norway are considered a miscarriage of justice, in which case I'm not qualified to evaluate if it's true or not (but if it is, it needs a source), or it might mean that the postwar trials in general are considered a miscarriage of justice, in which case it's just wrong. Furthermore, the anon who introduced the statement has made only two edits to Wikipedia; both were to this stub, and taken together they would appear to have been intended to introduce a pro-Quisling POV. Binabik80 22:13, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This text translates from the Norwegian article: In later times these verdicts became controverial, as the death penalty was reintroduced into the Norwegian legal system by the exiled cabinet towards the end of the war in order to deal with the post-war trials. __meco 17:22, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Statement about lifetime sentence

There is no mention of him being sentenced to prison in the Norwegian article. On the contrary, it reads: Skancke was surprisingly unanimously sentenced to death on May 21, 1946 for treason. After the Supreme Court on March 17, 1947 upheld the death penalty verdict Skancke attempted to have the case reopened. __meco 17:22, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Ragnar Skancke. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:56, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]