Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:Rigid bus

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merge Article

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Should the Single-deck bus and Rigid bus be merge because the article a bit same 138.75.127.29 (talk) 19:15, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support. The articles are almost identical. Also, they have similar scope which is best covered in one article. Single-deck bus should be merged to Rigid bus. Mast303 (talk) 04:50, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose single-vs-double and rigid-vs-articulated are separate concepts (we have at least four articles on the specific types of each concept). It's quite possible that there is content that should be re-organized/consolidated or shuffled among the various articles based on those different distinctions. DMacks (talk) 04:44, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. As DMacks notes, single-deck buses can be articulated and rigid buses can be double-deck. Equally I agree that there's a good chance that a number of bus-related articles could be re-organised, but I would want to see a more comprehensive plan for that before making a judgement. XAM2175 (T) 19:22, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Soft oppose Although looking at and agreeing with the points made by opposing parties, Single-deck bus is way too UK-centric and should be broadened to a global scope. Aren't most buses in the world single-decks? Hullian111 (talk) 23:54, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.