Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:Runaway (dependent)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I could have been.

[edit]

Had I taken an interest in Japanese culture (and Anime) earlier in life (particularly, the 7th Grade or sooner), then due to the immense turmoil at school through having a paraprofessional that year, I would have ran away to the West Coast, so I could sneak aboard a ship to Japan, and find a better life there.

In fact, I plan on sending to my former High School Counselor my thoughts on this "what if" issue, so she can tell me what her thoughts are about this.

It may have been good to not run away, or it may have been good to do so and reach Japan (if circumstances and fate allowed for it). Regardless, I felt a great portion of my youth was wasted because of that year. Gone, at least 'til the day Dechronification comes along.

The Letter:

(Due to immense editing & formatting issues, a link to a blog entry displaying the letter will instead be provided in the future.)

Please, share your thoughts about this too, either here or on my User_Talk page.

Fishy Stats

[edit]

I have to doubt the number of runaways in the United States:

"It is estimated that each year there are between 1.3 and 1.5 million runaway and homeless youth in the United States (Coco & Courtney, 1998; Cauce et al., 1994)."

There are about 74 million people under the age of 18 in the US [1]. The stat above says that 1.5 million of them will run away every year, which is 2.02%. Now imagine a cohort of children (a group of kids the same age). In the 18 years it takes for our cohort to become adults, 36.5% of them will run away? Perhaps the same kids will run away several times, but that still seems like a huge number. 32.97.110.142 19:08, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm doubting that one too. I live in LA -- and while you do see a lot of homeless people and mentally ill (it's inevitable!) -- I rarely, if ever, have seen a runaway kid. ― LADY GALAXY ★彡 Refill/lol 18:49, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
While I agree that the 1.5 million stat is a bit dubious, I think you're misreading it a little. It claims that every year there will be 1.5 million runaways, not that there will be 1.5 million new runaways. I think the "each year" bit is there to illustrate the ongoing nature of the problem. --Ddawn23 09:33, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Many runaway kids don't exactly live on the street 24/7... bare in mind that they're considered runaways as long as they're out of their parents houses. Many kids run away more than once, too, inflating the numbers. --W.marsh 23:55, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
More importantly, you can't just say 36.5% will run away. Certain types of kids in certain situations are likely to runaway. As for why you don't see them, you probably do. Unlike the mentally ill or elderly homeless people (especially men), they often still care about what others think of them and take great pains to at least appear semi-clean. How can you tell that the teenager you saw wondering around the mall wasn't shopping but was actually killing time until enough people clear out of the bus depot that he or she can sleep there? A good way to prevent your children running is to keep a good relashinship with them and to know what is hapening in there lives. - 67.166.139.181 07:57, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

None of the statistics

[edit]

have citations, or external links to prove that the citations there are real. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.22.195.167 (talk) 07:44, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

love

[edit]

means to love some one and to love forever


means to not runaway or nothing —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.151.248.185 (talk) 05:22, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

crime for helping a runnaway

[edit]

it is stated that it is a midemenor and called "harboring a runaway". yet in a recent case (http://www.istockanalyst.com/article/viewiStockNews/articleid/3455835) it was called 'kidnapping', and the person in question faces 25 years in prison. obviouly a felony. a serious one.

it is also important to note that nothing sexual is mentioned here. and equally important, with their ages (15 and 18) sex would be permissable —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.118.135.219 (talk) 03:58, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Runaway (dependent). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:24, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"75% of runaways are female"

[edit]

The article claims this and cites this page, but I just read it and don't see that fact anywhere. The only similar quote is "Also noted in the congressional report, females are more likely than males to run away,". Should the statistic be removed or a new citation found? --Aabicus (talk) 10:05, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I'm going to rephrase it as I think the statistic is wrong as stated. The article cites this congressional report, which in turn cites this 2010 report which lists a mere 2% difference between male and female runaway percentages. --Aabicus (talk) 10:11, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]