Talk:S2G reactor
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the S2G reactor article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Inherent problems?
[edit]Current article reads Due to inherent problems with the concept, the Seawolf was later converted with a S2Wa Nautilus-type pressurized water reactor. That's consistent with what the S1G reactor article says, but not what the article on USS Seawolf (SSN-575) says: ADM Rickover had planned all along to standardize submarine reactor power plants. My understanding has always been that both concepts appeared sound, but Rickover chose the PWR. Andrewa 09:59, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class Ships articles
- All WikiProject Ships pages
- Start-Class military history articles
- Start-Class maritime warfare articles
- Maritime warfare task force articles
- Start-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
- Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
- Start-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- Start-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- Start-Class energy articles
- Unknown-importance energy articles