Talk:SM-102

Chemicals Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pharmacology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

someone add the MSDS[edit]

124.169.140.19 (talk) 05:26, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It has been added several times but is being removed as an act of vandalism. Typical wikipedia, putting vandals in charge of pages.

Hiding it instead of explaining what it means only makes everything worse.

See WP:OWN re your misconception about putting in charge. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 11:59, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So adding the MSDS is an act of vandalism? Really?

re: data sheet[edit]

The data sheet referred to above is for SM-102 in a 90% chloroform solution... the hazards listed apply to the chloroform (see first response here: https://medicalsciences.stackexchange.com/questions/26258/is-sm-102-a-safe-ingredient-in-the-moderna-vaccine-despite-these-safety-warning for more details)... and thus having this data sheet appended would be misleading...likely why it keeps getting taken down Jacqwightman (talk) 21:42, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 20 May 2021[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

‹ The template Edit semi-protected is being considered for merging. ›

Edit this part:

"Administration of luciferase mRNA in SM-102-containing lipid nanoparticles induces hepatic luciferase expression in mice"

for clarity please - people are starting to conflate the luciferase mRNA effects in mice as side effects of sm-102, and using this article to back-up sm-102 being an 'unsafe' ingredient in the Moderna vaccine..

Also, adding a citation to that sentence would help. Jacqwightman (talk) 21:37, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. TG HL ↗ 01:22, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Plagiarism[edit]

The content of this article is copied directly, word-for-word, from the Cayman Chemical product insert: https://www.caymanchem.com/pdfs/33474.pdf - 90.255.54.46 (talk) 09:50, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]