Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:Saaya Irie

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

inaccurate forums?

[edit]

"If you stop the riot, I show my tits by uploading photos!" The above is particular problematic as both the Chinese wiki and the Japanese wiki do NOT have that line added at the end of her "plea". So I will remove it. Hanfresco 03:45, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

あのね、うそを言うことが止めて下さい。原文は

「日本の11歳の巨乳ロリドル入江沙綾が中国人民のみなさんに言うお! 大好きなお兄ちゃん、日本の美少女沙綾のおねがいです、反日のおいたをしないでください。そうじゃなきゃ、あなたを?いになっちゃうかも。もし反日さわぎをやめて、中国の民主化のために努力してくれるなら、すぐにわたしのおっばいうPします!!! 中国人民よ団結してください!!」

ですけど、同じ雑誌の中国語原文は 「日本11歲豐乳小妹入江沙綾向所有中國人民布告!!親愛的哥哥,日本美女沙綾求求?,中國人民團結起來!」

Nowhere does the Chinese original contain "If you stop the riot, I show my tits by uploading photos!" This sentence first, and ONLY appeared in the Japanese "translated" (imagined) version. If you don't believe me, I'd be more than happy to link you to a scan of the page. The only way for the contended sentence to appear is to clearly indicate the fact that it was added onto the translation. But that's only gonna happen if you respond to this discussion page to indicate to me that you understand what's going on. Until then, the improper sentence will be removed. Mind you again that, neither the Chinese nor Japanese wiki found it a place in their articles. Hanfresco 11:08, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is an OR that you did.
You've got the Japanese-sentence wrong.
Let me explain.
The term "私の" means "my"
The term "おっぱい" means "tits"
The term "うp" is a japanese internet slang term that means "uploading something" (in this case, "uploading photos")
59.128.68.180 20:08, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The point is not fact. The point is how the event was written in the citation.WP:VERIFY
Any problems ?
59.128.68.180 21:12, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I understand perfectly what the Japanese is saying. You do not need to translate for me what I already know from reading. Just as you said you're reporting a citation, SO AM I. Except, I'm reporting the un-defiled Chinese translation. Conveniently, you chose to ignore this sentence: The only way for the contended sentence to appear is to clearly indicate the fact that it was added onto [Japanese] translation. And Yes, there is a problem. You are pushing your own POV while refusing to compromise. Are you willing compromise? You may add the sentence back in when you're ready to, once again, compromise. Hanfresco 06:10, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I get it. [1] Any complaints ?
59.128.65.112 11:28, 22 March 2007 (UTC) 59.128.68.180[reply]

I agree! wikipedia has chosen to report from a scandalous magazine again and again ! Saaya's management has been contacted! none of what wikipeda has posted is factual! I hope Saaya sues! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Airrunwesker (talkcontribs) 10:57, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

VfD results

[edit]

This article was nominated for deletion. The result was keep. For details, please see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Saaya Irie. -- BD2412 talk 21:38, July 10, 2005 (UTC)

not sure if this was covered in the discussion, but the article is either a direct copy of or directly copied by the answers.com site about Saaya - www.answers.com/topic/saaya-irie — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.70.217.213 (talk)

It is the other way around, Answers.com copies from Wikipedia, which is fine. --Pmsyyz 00:41, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is this picture legal?!?!?!?

[edit]

Is this picture legal?!?!?!? shes only 12. JobE6 00:17, 24 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I got banned from 4chan for posting the image a month ago :( --Alexie 05:42, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

4chan reserves the right to ban users for literally anything.

Quitting modeling?

[edit]

According to http://nozomionline.com/entertainment/sweetkiss.html she is quitting modeling.

on her next CD cover, she was again wearing a bikini , so i do8ubt that has any relevance.Gimmiet 07:26, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe, Quote: "...have also considered no longer posing in bikini’s." Saying that the band INCLUDING Saaya is "considering" this. I hope she doesn't, It'll be quite sad if she goes! It is/was a proud moment for japanese pre-teens. Unknown 00:32, 14 December 2006 (NZST)

Fake Myspace?

[edit]

Quite possibly.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.133.249.120 (talk) 09:28, 9 February 2006

Good point. It's not really encyclopedic anyway, and need not be linked, even if it is real. – Mipadi 14:24, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Playboy

[edit]

Should someone mention her being on the cover of Playboy magazine of Japan? She wasn't nude or anything, but I think there was an interview with her or something. [2]

Insert Pedobear here. --Alexie 06:14, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It was actually a japanese magazine called Weekly Playboy.[3] --louciano

"Second category" magazine?

[edit]

I've tried to clean up the English usage in the As a gravure idol section. One expression, however, has me confused. Can someone please explain what a "second category magazine" is?

I assume that this means a magazine of lower quality and less respectability than a "first category" magazine, but it is difficult for me to find an analagous usage in American English. The word “tabloid” already has perjorative connotations (tones of lower quality) in standard American and British usage. In Japan, are there just "first category" and "second category" magazines, or are there also "third category", etc.? Is a "second category" magazine something that most people wouldn't buy, or would be embarrassed to be seen reading?

I would appreciate anyone helping me to understand this concept better. If so, then I can try to offer a better translation of the phrase in the article.

Thanks. --Eliyahu S Talk 07:13, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yahoo Account

[edit]

Why doesn't this mention her Yahoo! Account? Is it because her Yahoo! Account is fake? http://answers.yahoo.com/my/profile?show=D4waR5kLaa --69.234.205.38 (talk) 03:47, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A bit late, but I do believe most stuff that brands celebrity names on it (even online profiles, like MySpace, Facebook, and the like) are, indeed, a hoax. No way Saaya actually has time for this stuff. Also, some celebs do keep actual profiles (I had Jin, Natalise, Kaila Yu, and Natasha Yi added on Facebook, for example), however they would make it quite obvious, with exclusive photos and such. Usually it's social networking; the ones on YA are just the Martha Stewart types and you may see a few on the front page from time to time. Dasani 17:27, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2005 anti-Japanese demonstrations

[edit]

I am disputing the factual accuracy of this section because there is no solid proof that she herself has said any of those things. Anyone on the Internet can claim to be anyone else and even though her pictures may have 'eased tensions', the fact remains that she has never personally admitted to making such a claim.

Shuukan Bunshun is also known for a number of litigation's involving defamation and other articles about the demonstrations are the Japanese equivalent of tabloid magazines. 75.70.232.234 (talk) 02:08, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.thisistrue.com/saayairie.html
That article (originally published in True) adds further credence to the claims made in this page, even if the individual in question only has a small citation to support the claims made here. -- 209.51.86.128 (talk) 21:49, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Photo on Thai wikipedia page

[edit]

Should this be transferred to the English wiki? http://th.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%B9%84%E0%B8%9F%E0%B8%A5%E0%B9%8C:Saaya_Irie.jpg —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.234.185.65 (talk) 16:14, 24 February 2009 (UTC) that magazine where wiki got the info is a scandle magazine! may artist are suing it and the services that host it! I tried to edit wiki over and over, and members keep reporting the lies! i have contacted Saaya's management and I hope she sues! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Airrunwesker (talkcontribs) 10:59, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bad ISBN

[edit]

Because it is causing a Checkwiki error #72. ISBN-10 with wrong checksum", I removed the ISBN from the entry:

アクアガール2 入江紗綾 [Aqua Girl 2] (February 2007, Elk Heart Promotion) ISBN 4-903590-43-1 Parameter error in {{ISBN}}: checksum

I have tried unsuccessfully to locate the correct ISBN on the Internet. The Japanese version of this Wiki article does not specify any identifier for the DVD. The ISBN for version 1 of this film, while valid (i.e. does not cause any errors), fails to produce hits anywhere except Wiki articles. In my experience, DVDs usually do not have an ISBN; if anyone can provide an Amazon identifier or EAN, that would suffice. Knife-in-the-drawer (talk) 02:12, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Potential sources

[edit]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Saaya Irie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:34, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]