Talk:Sarah Cooper/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 21:34, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:34, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Here and in other sections, change "lip syncing" and "lip synced" to "lip-syncing" and "lip-synced".

In the first reference, the Wayback Machine template isn't necessary or ideal to use since other references don't have it. May I suggest using "<ref>{{cite web|url=|title=|date=|first=|last=|website=|archive-url=|archive-date=|url-status=live|access-date=}}</ref>" this instead?
Add a comma after "College Park".

Remove the comma after "comedy in Atlanta".
"of self-help book" → "of a self-help book"
Remove the commas after "performing on TikTok" and "economical political satire".
The Princess Bride should link to The Princess Bride (film).

PEOPLE.com → People
streamys.org → Streamy Awards
Mark references from The New Yorker with "|url-access=registration".
Mark references from Adweek with "|url-access=subscription".
Mark references from Financial Times with "|url-access=subscription".
Mark references from Los Angeles Times with "|url-access=limited".
Mark references from The New York Times with "|url-access=limited".
Mark references from Rolling Stone with "|url-access=limited".
Mark references from Time with "|url-access=limited".
Mark references from The Atlantic with "|url-access=limited".
Mark references from Vogue with "|url-access=limited".
Mark references from Vanity Fair with "|url-access=limited".
The two references after "the 2020 Democratic National Convention" are missing websites.
The reference after the "Associated Press" should link to the source.

Hopefully now all done, but let me know about any outstanding issues with these. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 14:52, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@BennyOnTheLoose: Everything else looks good but her specific birthdate still needs a source. c (talk) 15:14, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your constructive review, Some Dude From North Carolina. I've reached out to the co-nominator about the date of birth, as they may be able to resolve this more quickly than I can. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 15:23, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Some Dude From North Carolina - In the absence of a reliable source for Cooper's full date of birth being available, the article now just states her year of birth. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 22:59, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·