Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:Self-destructive behavior

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 16 January 2019 and 1 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mdarrow18, Abbyswope1.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 08:54, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bibliography Notes

[edit]

People with self-destructive behavior aren't aware of healthy coping mechanisms, so they tend to be more violent, usually, this is an emotional response to a bad past life or memory.

Mdarrow18 (talk) 03:09, 21 February 2019 (UTC)Madison Darrow[reply]

[1]

As I start to look deeper into self-destructive behavior, I'm looking for reliable sources. I would appreciate feedback on what you all this about these sources!

https://www.aconsciousrethink.com/9153/self-destructive-behavior/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8eAA1WPFyk

https://study.com/academy/lesson/self-destructive-behavior-signs-causes-effects.html

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1957928

Thanks,

Mdarrow18 (talk) 01:40, 11 February 2019 (UTC)Madison Darrow[reply]

Everything in the article relates to the topic and there is a lot of good content that is worth the read. The dates in this article only go back to 2018, so it is really up to date. The only thing I could see that would need improvement is the amount of content on one article. It could have been summed up in a better manner than what it is. This topic could be very bias depending on which side of the issue you are on, but the person who wrote this kept it neutral. Most of the references come straight from online PDF'S, meaning that the information provided is accurate. The links provided below the article do work and they send you to websites that are very reliable. I don't see any talking going on behind the scenes of this article. The article is rated a B in all categories.Mdarrow18 (talk) 21:07, 15 February 2019 (UTC)Abby Swope[reply]

References


Self Harm & Self Sabotage

[edit]

I think this page should also include behaviours and actions that do not inflict physical harm but are rather intended to "sabotage" or "ruin" ones life in some way or form: for instance, intentionally ignoring work/study deadlines, self care and hygiene and avoiding help. Page is also lacking in holistic details. Perhaps this page should be merged with the self harm page? Cupio Dissolvi (talk) 05:07, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Why is Pimozide listed here? Cameronsto 01:59, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why is "Behaviour" spelled here with a "u"? Spirit Stiff (talk) 04:35, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Manual of Style#National varieties of English --209.244.43.122 (talk) 21:37, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Masturbation. What?!

[edit]

"Self abuse" redirects here. For other uses, see Masturbation."

You cannot be serious? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.217.93.216 (talk) 13:35, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Fixed (not by me though) Lova Falk talk 19:36, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Opening image

[edit]

The opening image of the two persons abusing alcohol is far too comical, or satirical, and undermines the seriousness of the subject as a whole. A more serious, and sober, yet G-rated image would be far more appropriate for the article. Oceanic84 (talk) 23:26, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Adult Development Spring 2022

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 April 2022 and 18 July 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jordyn.jones0902 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Jordyn.jones0902 (talk) 20:05, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

When does Ferenczi ever say that this is a result of fantasy, not memory?

[edit]

I'm assuming we're saying the 1895 thesis is the Aetiology of Hysteria, which Freud later rejected as true but Ferenczi famously did not. I mean, correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think the two even knew each other at this time. 2600:6C58:200:126D:84D5:CB67:FC7B:90EE (talk) 02:45, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Subtle unabomber reference necessary?

[edit]

I noticed in the second paragraph that mention was made to our modern society "and its consequences", which feels like a sly play at referencing the unabomber manifesto. I'm all for meta-commentary, but unsure if this one really works without feeling too forced. 2A00:23C8:7480:4F01:10F7:3006:A798:A646 (talk) 15:41, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]