Talk:Sexy People (The Fiat Song)
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Not moved. Jafeluv (talk) 14:05, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Sexy People (The Fiat Song) → Sexy People – Per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. It is the only article with the name. Currently, Sexy People redirects to another artist. Erick (talk) 16:32, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose - it may well be WP:PRIMARYTOPIC now, but so was Sexy People (Lolene song) (new redirect) in 2009. According to WP:RECENT we need to take a longer view. Also, despite the capital P, the title is probably generic enough that anyone searching for the Arianna song will probably find the current dab (The Fiat song) helpful. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:04, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
- But then why would "Sexy People" still need to be redirected to Lolene? A simple hatnote for readers looking for Lolenen's song on top of the article should suffice. Erick (talk) 00:18, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
- It wouldn't, according to WP:TWODAB we can have a dab with only 2 subjects. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:57, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, but having a disambiguation page is pointless if only one of them has an article. Erick (talk) 01:21, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
- Why? Why is reading about a single as part of an album article pointless if that is the single the reader is looking for? Must all singles be broken out to separate articles before we allow readers looking for them to find them? In ictu oculi (talk) 01:41, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
- I apologize, but I don't follow what you're saying. Erick (talk) 02:17, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
- Why? Why is reading about a single as part of an album article pointless if that is the single the reader is looking for? Must all singles be broken out to separate articles before we allow readers looking for them to find them? In ictu oculi (talk) 01:41, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, but having a disambiguation page is pointless if only one of them has an article. Erick (talk) 01:21, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
- It wouldn't, according to WP:TWODAB we can have a dab with only 2 subjects. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:57, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
- But then why would "Sexy People" still need to be redirected to Lolene? A simple hatnote for readers looking for Lolenen's song on top of the article should suffice. Erick (talk) 00:18, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose create a disambiguation page instead, per IIO ; a third entry would be Don't Trust the B---- in Apartment 23 which has an episode by that name -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 06:30, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose. Unnecessary move and I cannot see why The Fiat People should be divorced from their song called Sexy People. Also WP:RECENT applies as does WP:COMMONSENSE. --Richhoncho (talk) 14:40, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
- Okay then, in that case, I withdraw this nominations. Erick (talk) 00:21, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.