Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:Shivraj Singh Chouhan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

sirji aap se baat karni hai sir ji

Do not discuss apart WP:TPG

[edit]

Please avoid to put information on talk pages or anywhere on Wikipedia, that is unacceptable and falls under

for more awareness about how to behave at talk pages, please go for WP:TPG --Dr.pragmatist (talk) 07:09, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Add controversial section

[edit]

Please, add a controversial section in which irregularities of illegal mining dumper scam and other allegation which are under investigation are mentioned. --Prabhatbaghel (talk) 11:15, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Done As of now important controversies have been mentioned by some user. But do not expect to add news materials. Thanks--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS  15:10, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MADHODAY I WANT YOUR ADDRESS FOR SEND LETTER — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.168.223.0 (talk) 04:15, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Remove controversial section

[edit]

Digvijay singh is a leader of rival party and his accusation do not form the basis of any indulgence of shivraj singh chouhan involvment in scam . The matter is in court and he is not even accused nor found guilty . Then why this section is involved in his personal biography ? Criticizing state government does not means the person is involved in wrong doings .Why then accusations are used as basis for adding a section ? there is a leader called [Arvind kejriwal] several accusations have been put by his fellow members but no controversy section is included on that page .malign anybody name just because some political rival has accused is not good sign of quality articles .They look good on news site but wikipedia is not a new website . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.38.200.66 (talk) 17:37, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! It's not about Digvijaya Singh but the fact has been stated. Request you to please refrain from removing the content as all of it is properly referenced. You can post on the Talk page first and let other editors decide on it.Katyaan (talk) 05:28, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi did any official facts accuse him of corruption ? If not why these are put here ? all reference material is accusation .If accusation form basis of content then why various leaders pages are refrained from it ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.38.200.66 (talk) 11:57, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
None of them is accusation but all these issues are under investigation. Further, you are free to add the content if you feel the whole truth has not been out there. E.g. in first paragraph under corruption charges, it has been mentioned that he and his wife were accused but later court gave them the clean chit. Katyaan (talk) 08:31, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

to sir mai ek sainik hua. mera gaun rewa distt ke kharahana hai mai apani ma ke name se 16 dismil ki jamin road ke kinare liya .mera pariwar bhopal me rahate hai jis karan mohan lal mishra ne isaka phaida utha kar usme diwar bana diya our jan se mere pariwar ko marne ke liye kaha hai our police thana mangawa me report bhi darge ki gai hai lekin koe karya bahi nahi hui aap ke bhi help line me bhi 4 bar sikayat ki gai lekin koi karya bahi nahi ki gaesir aap ke name se bhi mai letter bheja ho.lekin koi karya bahi nasi hui hai am apani jan kater me dal kar desh seva kar rahe hai lekin koi phayada nahi hamri jamin dusare le rahe hai kipa kar ke esaki jach ki jaya our uchit karya wahiki jay from 30002827X LNK Pradeep Mishra 16 Rajput c/o 56 APO.

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Shivraj Singh Chouhan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:37, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:56, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]