Talk:Site of Nature Conservation Interest

Environment Mid‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Protected areas Mid‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article title

I've just incorporated various synonyms for this designation into the lead para, and done redirects for them to here.

However, Site of Nature Conservation Importance (SNCI) does not sit very well with the various other names. While it is widely used, it is really just one of several equally valid terms, some of which are also widely used. Would it perhaps be better to rename the article to a more general term, and make SNCI one of the redirects?

The trouble is, what term? PPS 9 just uses "Local Site", which is fine in context, but as the name of an article it's very general and likely to get confused with other things. "Non-statutory wildlife site" is likewise rather general, and though widely used in conservation, it has no formal basis I know of. Any ideas? --Richard New Forest (talk) 10:23, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think it would be best to rename the article 'Local Site'. It is recommended by DEFRA as a generic name, and you have to look at many articles to see what they are about. Any other ideas? Dudley Miles (talk) 19:10, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Site of Nature Conservation Interest. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20121129124243/http://www.gigl.org.uk:80/igigl/map.aspx to http://www.gigl.org.uk/igigl/map.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:34, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]