Talk:Skeptical theism

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophy of religion

Religion

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

it's a new idea how?

i fail to see how it's different from the ordinary approach used by the christian theologists for millenia, for instance for 'greater good' and similar theodicies; the very text of the bible says that humans can't know the thoughts and ways of god (1 corinthans 2:11, romans 11:33):

Is there anyone who can understand his own thoughts except his own inner spirit? In the same way, no one can know the thoughts of God except God’s Spirit.

O how deep are God’s riches, and wisdom, and knowledge! How unfathomable are his decisions and unexplainable are his ways!

i don't see how it deserves a separate article which claims some paul darper as the founder of this idea. 5.143.97.211 (talk) 10:36, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Developing this article to add detail and background

I am currently developing this article as described above.

KSci ^(talk) 20:56, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The argument presented is not in modus ponens form

It's modus tollens 2600:1700:39C0:5FE0:71C8:9511:ACCF:5333 (talk) 17:48, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]