Talk:Solar Power (album)

Solar Power (album) is currently an Albums good article nominee. Nominated by De88 (talk) at 04:13, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article. This review will be closed by the first reviewer. To add comments to this review, click discuss review and edit the page.

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum

Lorde (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lorde, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.LordeWikipedia:WikiProject LordeTemplate:WikiProject LordeLorde

New Zealand: Music Mid‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the New Zealand music task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Roots music Low‑importance

	Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Roots music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to roots, folk and traditional folk music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Roots musicWikipedia:WikiProject Roots musicTemplate:WikiProject Roots musicRoots music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Does anyone have a source for the length of tracks in the Deluxe edition of the album?

Tried to find one for "Helen of Troy" and "Hold No Grudge" but couldn't, even though they're listed at 5:47 and 10:03 minutes here respectively. REEC1394 (talk) 20:48, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@REEC1394: I can't find a source either. I'll remove the information. Thanks! D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 23:02, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Prod. column

@LivelyRatification: Prod column is still needed although there are repeated items. Only notes look strange :( -- BrandNew Jim Zhang (talk) 04:20, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Don't really mind either way - we have no writer's column for Melodrama (Lorde album), through granted, there's only two songs with variations, whereas this has four. --LivelyRatification (talk) 04:23, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@BrandNew Jim Zhang and LivelyRatification: I removed the producer column because, at the time, only 25% of the track listing (3 songs) had variations. But, I saw that there was also a variation for a fourth track, so I added it in, making it 33% (4 songs) that had a variation, which is a lot. I didn't think of reverting my initial edit to remove the producer column, so thank you both for doing that. Thanks! D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 15:07, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Okay :)-- BrandNew Jim Zhang (talk) 02:11, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 20 August 2021

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Under “critical reception,” please add: In a positive review for Paste Magazine, Matt Mitchell wrote “There isn’t a running theme of despair like there was on Melodrama, but there doesn’t need to be. The elegance of Solar Power is in its warmth, how you can put it on and not pay much attention to its details, and still catch yourself hitting replay.”

https://www.pastemagazine.com/music/lorde/solar-power-album-review/ Tnhc0415 (talk) 19:19, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit semi-protected}} template. The quote is too long, and the section is already well developed. Is there any particular reason we need more quotes from critics in an already five paragraph long section with almost 600 words? ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 19:31, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Songwriting credits

Please check ASCAP Repertory or APRA AMCOS search for song-writing credits before editing. This takes a few seconds to check. e.g. for "Hold no Grudge" we can use:
https://www.apraamcos.co.nz/search?works=true&title=Hold%20no%20Grudge&writer=&performer=Lorde
--Xagent86 (Talk | contribs) 12:32, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This ASCAP Repertory search might also be useful to find the songs where James Ryan Ho (Malay), is listed as a writer on songs where Lorde is listed as a performer. --Xagent86 (Talk | contribs) 06:44, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Solar Power (album)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: De88 (talk · contribs) 04:13, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Vestrian24Bio (talk · contribs) 06:07, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I will be reviewing this article, expect the initial remarks soon! Vestrian24Bio 06:07, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

@De88:

EARWIG shows 25.4% - violations unlikely.
According to link-dispenser,
- There are 5 refs that could be down and don't have an archive link.
- 100+ refs in this article need archive links.
Are refs 51, 58, 60, 82, 91, 95, 109 and 112 reliable?
Could use the {{album chart}} template for Year-end charts as well.

Vestrian24Bio 11:38, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Final review

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed