Talk:Soviet Union and the United Nations

International relations: United Nations High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject United Nations.

Socialism Low‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Soviet Union Mid‑importance

	Soviet Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

NPOV

The article seems to be rather POV to me, both in terms of wording, and factually. Most statements are not backed by citations either, making matters worse. I've marked the most notable points, but frankly, it looks like the article is best being rewritten from scratch, with only some pieces of the present article reused. I do not have time for this at the moment, but might get to it eventually if noone else will pick up the ball in the meantime. int19h 12:23, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be porfessionally written, at least thats what I think.

I agree

Someone should add a considerable amount to this article, the relationship between theese two countries did after all shape the 20th century.

2 countries?

? The United Nations isn't a country...or is it? Ä===UN is not. Soviet Union was a member of United Nation=== ݜ Ydon205 (talk) 19:51, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rewrite

This, as it is, is simply not a Wikipedia article - one good source I found so far for the rewrite is this: [1]. I probably won't have the time to work on this for quite a while. --... there's more than what can be linked. 18:50, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Seats for the Soviet Union and USA

The article says, "The United States was also offered two additional seats, but due to political problems (regarding which two of the 48 states would be represented), it was never acted upon." Without citing to a page number, this is sourced to Ulam's "Stalin: The Man and His Era." At pages 606-607, the book says that after Stalin gained his extra seats, he offered, "...if the senators still raised difficulties for his American friend, he would be happy for the United States to have three seats, too." Nothing in that part of the book indicates the US actually was offered additional seats, let alone that the deal fell apart because the US could not assign its extra seats. I'll remove the sentence if no one objects. Arnold Rothstein1921 (talk) 01:12, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

UN employees

Following statement is false: It was rather notorious that a large percentage of employees in the U.N. bureaucracy who had Soviet citizenship were NKVD/KGB or GRU agents, who in some cases hardly even bothered to conceal it... AnonMoos (talk) 12:10, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]