Talk:Stratovision

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Television Mid‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Stratovision and education

I wish that people who love to edit the creative work of others would resist the impulse to act as judge of a work when it is clear from the dates of historical entry that it is a work in progress. The reason why I originally added education as a category is because one of the biggest uses of Stratovision was educational television which lasted for a period of years. Unfortunately I have to sleep, eat, do other things in life and so I can't do everything immediately. So next time you get the urge to delete, pause first then even take the time to send the editor a note enquiring why such and such is so. You might get a friendly reply. The other way shows a degree of superioritiy in attitude and that only tends to irk other people who are creating the content and without content there is no encyclopedia. MPLX/MH 05:07, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Oh, grow up. Your articles get edited, deal with it. Don't want to give up ownership of your work? You can leave. Rhobite 05:27, Dec 10, 2004 (UTC)

Why are you so rude and why do you launch into a personal attack? I contribute to Wikipedia and my contributions have creative value. I don't appreciate being addressed in this way. Is it possible for you to use a civil tone and drop me a friendly note if there is something that is not clear? Would that be too much to ask of you? I don't think that others would appreciate being told to leave and I don't believe that this is in the spirit of Wikipedia. I do appreciate those who tidy stuff up and add links and so on, but your behavior is uncalled for and yes, I am offended by it. MPLX/MH 06:04, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Regarding content: I have now added sections dealing with education, propaganda and the temporary nature of the service today. I have other material in my personal files concerning the use of Stratovision technology by the USA in Vietnam and other locations and I intend to add this material on a time permitting basis. MPLX/MH 06:04, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Picture

I have added article picture, with two of the test participants (Frank Mullins, C.E. Nobles) identified. It would be great to identify more of the people in this picture! Andrew Koontz (talk) 18:52, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]