Talk:Subtropical Storm One (1974)

Subtropical Storm One (1974) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 27, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed

Weather: Tropical / Atlantic / Non-tropical Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Atlantic hurricane work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Non-tropical storms task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Article title

I'm curious, is this the best title for the article? I'm just wondering, since there was another subtropical storm later in the season that hit Florida. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Viennaiswaiting (talk • contribs) 18:27, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion it is, although I'm definitely open to suggestions if others see another title to be better fit. Although there were two subtropical storms that hit Florida in 1974, this was the more significant of the two and was the only one (of the two) that caused fatalities. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 20:52, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How about Subtropical Storm One (1974)? I know I'm normally against titles such as "Hurricane Nine (1356)" and "Tropical Storm Twenty (1844)", but in this case, NHC was calling the system Subtropical Storm One in the annual report and HURDAT. Thegreatdr (talk) 23:02, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, well, since it's officially referred to as "One" I'll move the article to that. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 23:25, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for making that redirect, then :( --Viennaiswaiting (talk) 01:23, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Moved per above. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 15:41, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]