Talk:Summer melt

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles

Education

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

One-sided research

Krgonzalez recently significantly expanded the article with a rather detailed essay on research into summer melt. While that's commendable, I'm somewhat concerned that it seems to be a single research group's results that are covered in extreme detail, droning out everything else written by others about that subject. That seems to give that one research group rather undue weight. Besides, there are some tone issues. I'll thus try and shorten the coverage and better integrate it with the rest of the article. Huon (talk) 16:16, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. It is almost like original research as if Wikipedia is being used here to publish new findings. There is an inline citation here and here so the sources seem to be good -- my problem is the overall balance of the article which highly favors the Castleman research, and it would be much better to have secondary sources commenting about the Castleman research, explaining its significance, etc.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 16:34, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]