Talk:The Calculus of Consent

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
	It is requested that a picture or pictures be included in this article to improve its quality.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Economics Mid‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of The Calculus of Consent be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Untitled

This is an excellent outline of the book. But I'm seeing red -- too much. No criticism of what's there, which is fine. But possibly the key ideas of key chapters could be expanded on (not necessarily in chapter form). A fuller exposition might tempt more readers to visit the original.

BW, Thomasmeeks 16:00, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Its an old article of mine that needs copyedit and expansion. Some redlinks possibly can be redirected to existing article. As most wiki, it is a job in progress - when somebody will want to improve it, they will. Thanks for the comments!--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 19:18, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nifty moniker. Expanded Categories for more attention. Thomasmeeks 16:30, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hyperlinks

The hyperlinks in the chapter titles are misleading. For example "The Bicameral Legislature" does not, as it would seem, lead to a summary of the chapter, but a general page on bicameral legislatures (where Buchanan is not mentioned). This is true for a number of the links from the chapter titles. To make it less misleading, perhaps just "Bicameral Legislature" should be the hyperlink, rather than including the article. May seem trivial, but perhaps it would help avoid confusion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.92.9.130 (talk) 18:14, 19 May 2014 (UTC)</span Vacalder91 (talk) 18:16, 19 May 2014 (UTC) [reply]