Talk:The Circus Starring Britney Spears/GA2
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: PeterGriffin • Talk 21:55, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
Lead
[edit]- Written fairly well, with the exception of a few grammar issues that Ive corrected as I thought necessary.
- Reads thoroughly and follows GA guidelines in terms of ref use and grammar.
- Lead is expansive and informative.
Background
[edit]- Written well, but needs some re-qording throughout the section.
- Some sentences and claims such as "Received worldwide attention and exceeded expections" need refs.
- Removed the sentence since there's no ref. Xwomanizerx (talk) 19:04, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Development
[edit]- Very expansive and broad in its coverage, also very informative.
- This section was nicely sourced and written.
Concert synopsis
[edit]- Reads well, however has some grammar issues are present.
- Spears' talked, things like that should be re-worded for Spears spoke etc.
Critical and commercial reception
[edit]- Nicely written and sourced, although could be longer and more detailed.
Autralian leg controversies
[edit]- Very well written and balanced. Informative, with direct wuotes from management and staff. Good job.
Opening acts, Setlists and Tour dates
[edit]- Sourced by Spear's official website. Nicely formatted and informative.
Additional notes etc.
[edit]- Sourced, not too heavy and needed info.
Box office score
[edit]- Sourced, and updated. Nicely formatted.
References
[edit]- All references are formatted according to GA level requirements and are used well.
All in all
[edit]- Besides for a few little problems, the article seems complete, well written and broad in is coverage. It seems well balanced and uses images when needed and wherever possible. Good aticle and nicely done!.
Thanks! I hope it's done now. Xwomanizerx (talk) 19:04, 16 August 2010 (UTC)