Talk:The Closing of the American Mind

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook

Philosophy: Literature / Social and political / Contemporary Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophical literature
	Social and political philosophy
	Contemporary philosophy

Higher education

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Butterworth, Charles L. (1989). "On Misunderstanding Allan Bloom: The Response to The Closing of the American Mind". Academic Questions. Vol. 2, no. 4. pp. 56–80. ISSN 0895-4852. (Specifically, see the relatively comprehensive bibliography.)
Stone, Robert L., ed. (1989). Essays on The Closing of the American Mind. Chicago: Chicago Review Press. ISBN 978-1-55652-052-5.

A more impartial description of the book would better serve Wikipedia's purpose.

This article should be edited to make it seem more impartial and objective, instead of seeming to reflect the opinion of the editor as to the validity, invalidity, correctness or incorrectness of the author's point of view. - Embram (talk) 15:30, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Treatment of this subject at Allan Bloom

The treatment of this subject over at Allan Bloom#Closing of the American Mind seems far more complete than we have here. I'm thinking of ~~replacing most of this article with the material from Allan Bloom, or better yet~~ simply changing this article to redirect to Allan Bloom, being sure of course to mention the ISBN and publishing date over there. Comments? --CliffC 02:59, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. This should be a separate Wikipedia article, as is done with practically every other well-known book or movie. Why make an exception for just this book? Doing so would only serve to bury it in a much larger article, thus decreasing the usability of Wikipedia and the users' access to information within it. Allowing the user to at least see the article would improve the usability of Wikipedia. Reference and a link to further discussion within the article about Allan Bloom could easily be incorporated within this article. - Embram (talk) 15:30, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Without objection, the motion has carried. Am redirecting this article to Allan Bloom. --CliffC 03:18, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Zap Zappa

I think that the sentence referencing Frank Zappa is odd and takes away from the flow of the article, maybe it should be moved to the critical reception section where other criticisms of the book are. (I don't have a page) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dcut74 (talk • contribs) 21:29, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on The Closing of the American Mind. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061208153310/http://home.online.no/~corneliu/npq.htm to http://home.online.no/~corneliu/npq.htm
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.salon.com/july97/columnists/paglia2970722.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:17, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]