Talk:The Peel Group
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Peel Group article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
How many divisions?
[edit]This article says five, but lists six. The company's website says four, but lists five. Choalbaton (talk) 17:49, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Major Rewrite
[edit]In order to establish notability and include reliable third-party sources a major rewrite is required, I would be willing to initiate this and possibly complete it if no-one else is willing to participate,
James50567 (talk) 21:22, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
Major Re-Write in progress, please bear with me whilst i undertake this task, the resultant article may be considerably smaller, but it will be better set out and contain more reliable references.
James50567 (talk) 17:00, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
2022 copy edit
[edit]Large sections of this article are out of date or are conflations of different periods, all misleadingly indicated as the present. It should be OK to not put a lot of "now" material into the article because peel do seem to be quite fluid and instead rely on a simple intro summary and bunging everything else into history with much reliance on underlying main articles.
I have broken the longer sections up and consigned much of the material to a history section. Many of the sections have main articles to link back to which I have put in place. Also, screeds of promotional material deleted. It should be possible to in many cases put the bare minimum here and rely on the main articles.
There are few adequate refs in place but many of the 'main articles' have good ones. to borrow.
I have no objections to anybody else picking up sections!
My intention has been to add something about the quoted investments in the intro.
Ed1964 (talk) 15:55, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- That'll do from me for now. Hopefully there are plenty of slots to insert new information in now.Ed1964 (talk) 23:29, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Doncaster Sheffield Airport
[edit]Should the closure of Doncaster Sheffield Airport be added to the list of controversies? 2A00:23C5:C309:E101:5444:76D7:D321:5F94 (talk) 10:03, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
- C-Class aviation articles
- C-Class airport articles
- WikiProject Airports articles
- WikiProject Aviation articles
- C-Class Greater Manchester articles
- Low-importance Greater Manchester articles
- C-Class company articles
- Low-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- C-Class United Kingdom articles
- Low-importance United Kingdom articles
- WikiProject United Kingdom articles
- C-Class Transport articles
- Low-importance Transport articles
- WikiProject Transport articles