Talk:The Tin Drum

Germany High‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Novels Top‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has an incomplete infobox template! - see Novels InfoboxCode or Short Story InfoboxCode for a pattern.

Anti-war High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anti-war, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the anti-war movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anti-warWikipedia:WikiProject Anti-warTemplate:WikiProject Anti-warAnti-war articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Translation studies Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Translation Studies, a collaborative effort to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Translation Studies. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of objectives.Translation studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Translation studiesTemplate:WikiProject Translation studiesTranslation studies articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Skip to table of contents

Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Tin Drum article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Need more about the book, then the movie

There really deserves to be more about the book rather than the movie. After all, it's the book that won Grass the Nobel Prize. I don't know enough about Grass and the book (other than having read it) to do this myself, but I thought I should call to attention the lack of information on the book.--70.245.244.104 16:57, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agree Morganfitzp 03:03, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I also haven't read the book or seen the movie, but the book is much more well-known and recognized than the movie. Perhaps this article should be split into the film and the book? In addition, the picture in the infobox is the cover of the Vintage International edition novel, while it is a film infobox, so the film's own cover art should be used. Poseidon^3 00:07, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agree (again) Morganfitzp 03:03, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, a Nobel is usually given for a "body of work", but this is the book that usually comes to mind when Grass comes up. John Duncan 02:07, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Technically

SPOILER->->->->->The narrative actually begins before Oskar is born. It begins with his grandmothers impregnation in the Kashubian potato fields. I agree, there needs to be much more about this book.65.102.39.98 23:24, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Commentary on film vs. book moved from talk page

This article should further be reviewed, though by other comments it is made apparent that the article is based on the film rather than on the novel, certain errors must be considered, ie. "{Oskar's mother having died, Alfred marries Maria, a woman who is secretly Oskar's first mistress. After marrying Alfred, Maria gives birth to Oskar's son, Kurt", there is no evidence in the text confirming Kurt's paternal origins. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.241.15.80 (talk • contribs)

References format

Does everyone think Harvard is the best approach in this article? Or should footnotes be used instead? John Duncan 02:09, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oskar's last name

Hello. *waves* I just went through the article and corrected some minor grammar and style issues, but I can't really do anything more because I've never read the book. However, there are a few questions I would like to ask:

Is there any indication of who the fathers of Oskar and Kurt might be in the books, or are the "possibly"'s just guesses based on who their mothers dated and/or married?
If Oskar's father is unknown, why is his last name Matzerath?
Is "Sigismund" the correct spelling of the toy store owner's first name? It looks like someone typed "Sigmund" wrong.
Is "Mnsterberg" the correct spelling of Bruno's last name?
What city is Dorothea from? It used to be "Dsseldorf", which I assumed meant Düsseldorf and corrected accordingly, but I might be wrong.

I look forward to collaborating with other editors to improve this article. Thanks, Clem (talk) 04:19, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and a correction?

I was the one who entered the characters which Clem moved to the Trilogy. The characters I entered were all from The Tin Drum. This novel is, itself, divided into three books. I leave it to others to decide where this information belongs. I will continue with my work on The Tin Drum page either way...thanks,Sabiona (talk) 21:10, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ulla?

The text has this part "... where he models in the nude with Ulla ..." Who is Ulla? There is nothing mentioned in the characters section. Explain please.--Auric (talk) 16:53, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The literary Ash experiment

My subjective opinion would be that it's only disgusting bullshit. But literature is much harder to evaluate and to judge than telling if three lines have the equal length. Conform to the majority opinion and if any piece of art has some "jewish" connotation, it can only be a masterpiece. Btw, i've almost read it fully. But maybe i don't have the intellectual capabilities of a Marcel Reich-Ranitzki to comprehend all the poetry and symbolism that's in this piece of "holocaust warning literature". I understood nothing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:66:EB67:A901:80C:FC08:7AD8:30D9 (talk) 21:11, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism

There is a wealth of authoritative criticism of The Tin Drum, and this article is badly in need of a summary of it. Deipnosophista (talk) 15:29, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Tin Drum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061228162416/http://www.supremefiction.com/theidea/2006/12/how_the_right_w.html to http://www.supremefiction.com/theidea/2006/12/how_the_right_w.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:38, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]