Talk:Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 12 months

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on March 28, 2004, March 28, 2005, March 28, 2006, March 28, 2009, March 28, 2010, and March 28, 2011.

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Energy Mid‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disaster management Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Occupational Safety and Health Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to occupational safety and health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Occupational Safety and HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthTemplate:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthOccupational Safety and Health articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Environment High‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Details

This page is about the details of the nuclear plant as a nuclear plant, and does not address the accident. The Three Mile Island article deals almost exclusively with the accident, and not at all with the plant. Thus, a redirect is not appropriate. Miros 19:56, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Okay, but it needed a better name than "Three Mile Island Nuclear". I gave it the full name provided by the other page and linked to it from there. --Fastfission 23:00, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)

good deal. Miros 20:03, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

It does not make sense for this article to be separate from the Three Mile Island Accident article. 100% of the users looking for information on the power plant will want information on the accident also.

Clash reference?

I'm not sure you can claim that the line "a nuclear error" is attributed to this particular event... There have been many more (or is there some evidence for this?).jackkenyon1991 20:40, 10 April 2008 (GMT)

Inconsistent

The undamaged reactor was shut down some time ago, as the article says, but the sidebar lists it as still operational. Andrewa (talk) 10:47, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Operational may be accurate; see SAFSTOR: it is not currently operating, but may be restarted. ---Avatar317 ^(talk) 00:39, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Constellation and Microsoft have announced plans to restart unit 1 by 2028[1]. I wonder how that relates to the statement from 2017 that "once the plant is completely shut down, it cannot be reopened". 37.201.7.108 (talk) 13:36, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to clean this up the best I can. SlaterRaptor1976 (talk) 14:31, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good. Andrewa (talk) 06:23, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reopening see also

Many readers of this article would also be interested in Palisades Nuclear Generating Station#Intention to restart operations and perhaps also Duane Arnold Energy Center#restart the other possible restart in the USA, but I'm not sure how to link them. Andrewa (talk) 05:11, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]