Talk:Tietze syndrome/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sennalen (talk · contribs) 16:32, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Beginning review. I expect this to be as close as possible to a speedy pass. Sennalen (talk) 16:32, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Clear and correct English without jargon.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	Most claims rest on review articles. Where works of primary research are cited, it is for literature reviews in the introduction. Compliance with WP:MEDRS is strong.
	2c. it contains no original research.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	No paraphrasing seems too close.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	The image is in the public domain.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.	The clean and functional division of sections is worthy of emulation.