Talk:Tropical Depression 08W (2021)

This article was nominated for merging with 2021 Pacific typhoon season in the past. The result of the discussion (permanent link) was to merge.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Tropical Depression 08W (2021) was copied or moved into 2021 Pacific typhoon season with this edit on 1 Aug 2021. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Necessity?[edit]

MERGE

Clear consensus to merge (including support !votes from both principal authors). Closing as proposer in accordance with WP:MERGECLOSE as discussion has essentially ceased and support is nearly unanimous. ~ KN2731 {talk · contribs} 07:01, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

As far as I can tell, there is little information on actual impact, besides limited flooding in a couple of villages. Most of the article appears to be WP:ROUTINE coverage of things that happen with every storm, such as rainfall warnings (not even near the highest level) and government meetings. A peak rainfall total of 94 mm isn't really significant – it's a typical day or two worth of rainfall in the tropics. I don't see the enduring notability needed for this to have a standalone article. ~ KN2731 {talk · contribs} 12:04, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

KN2731, Hmm, I also agree, this article is unnecessary, as it didn't do significant impact just minor rainfall and regional floods Beraniladri19 🌀🌀 12:12, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support for merge of this article. Beraniladri19 🌀🌀 12:13, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not Notable Tropical Depression Dam222 🌋 (talk) 12:23, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom HurricaneEdgar 12:26, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support fails WP:N. 🐔 Chicdat ^{Bawk to me!} 13:11, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support definitely not needed as an article, all impacts can be summed up on the season page. 🌀Cyclone Football71🏈 |sandbox 21:01, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Agreed. Sria >:3 SR.1111111 (talk)♥️ 21:03, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Even if it’s unnecessary there’s nothing wrong with it. even if it is merged so much info would be lost. 2600:1003:B45D:52D:5CE2:771A:3DE8:1296 (talk) 20:00, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree. Please continue. -Solarrrr... Send a message to Solar? Tappy tap tap! ⏰Time: 22:58, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral As the creator of this article. Although I saw in the first place that 08W doesn't deserve its own article, 2600:1003:B45D:52D:5CE2:771A:3DE8:1296 (talk) has a point. If the contents will be fully merged on the main (2021 Pacific typhoon season, then how? 08W is being forecasted to become a tropical storm while approaching Hainan-Vietnam; however, it failed. That's why I made this article. 🌀Hurricane Parrot🐦 01:43, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

changing to Support. I now understand everything, thanks to @Chlod:. 🌀Hurricane Parrot🐦 03:10, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support It's mostly details on preparation - most of which would be WP:ROUTINE actions taken by disaster preparedness agencies. The impacts are very minimal, and those can be transferred over to the main article. As for article creation, we create articles for storms which have a definite impact — rarely on meteorological forecast deviations. Wikipedia is a summary of information; it doesn't have to be totally inclusive of all you can find on a subject. As to the "how": Wikipedia project pages always have an answer, WP:MERGE. Chlod (say hi!) 02:03, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom and Chlod^. Just because a storm has impacted land does not mean an article must be created already. Typhoon2013 (talk) 07:09, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yea, this doesn't really need an article. CycloneEditor (talk) 11:06, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support, like everyone else said, the depression is not really significant so it really doesn’t need its own article. IBlazeCat (talk) 11:18, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support as the depression didn't really make that much of an impact to warrant its own article. Hansen Sebastian^Talk 14:25, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment ok can someone start the merging, the consensus is solid merge Beraniladri19 🌀🌀 07:49, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, okay, please start the merging process now. Looks like all here is supporting the merge move for 08W. Also my mistake for creating this. 🌀Hurricane Parrot🐦 07:17, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@KN2731: It's been ten days now and all support merge. Typhoon2013 (talk) 23:07, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.