Talk:Tueller Drill

	Law portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Firearms Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Sandel, William L.; Martaindale, M. Hunter; Blair, J. Pete (2021). "A scientific examination of the 21-foot rule". Police Practice and Research. 22 (3): 1314–1329. doi:10.1080/15614263.2020.1772785. S2CID 219765729.

Disagree[edit]

I disagree with the 'citation needed' here. The article appeals to common sense in "One would think", "Should be", and "has a dilemma". What sort of citations could cover this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.198.151.119 (talk) 07:49, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In popular culture: season 5 of "Justified"?[edit]

Would it be worth mentioning that season 5 of Justified make several indirect references to this as the "21-foot rule"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.65.211.107 (talk) 03:14, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A scientific examination of the 21-foot rule[edit]

A scientific examination of the 21-foot rule https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15614263.2020.1772785 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:CDA0:1060:398D:8970:4140:43B4 (talk) 12:19, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mythbuster[edit]

Assuming all other things being equal and correct, the Mythbusters reference should either be removed entirely or more pragmatically expanded to include the fact that the drill requires two center-of-mast shots. One shot at absolute point blank range (the attacker being close enough to grab the gun themselves) is a diffrent test, and therefore a diffrent result. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.10.163.44 (talk) 01:43, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blah[edit]

Topic is very deserving of inclusion, I can say as someone who got shafted by the cops. This article, however, is POV cop trash and in need of a complete rewrite. 76.70.97.144 (talk) 04:00, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]