This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology
Just so you fellow users are wondering, I redirected both Albertosaurinae and Aublysodontinae to this page article because I am not sure which one is its own subfamily. JRLivesey, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
Should Tyrannosaurini (Tyrannosaurus+ Tarbosaurus+ Zhuchengtyrannus) be written in the taxobox?
Tyrannosaurini has been used by paleontological papers since at least 1995. Also adding Tyrannosaurini could make it easier to understand how everything relates in this wiki 118.211.43.121 (talk) 04:15, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]