Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:U.S. Route 1/9 Truck

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleU.S. Route 1/9 Truck has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 30, 2009Good article nomineeListed

State Route designation

[edit]

There is much disagreement among sources about the number of the east-west section (Communipaw Ave etc) - some say 25T, some say 25M (of which there was another at New Brunswick, now 171), and some even say 25. --SPUI (talk) 08:06, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

25

(1930s, 1941 maps show 25 on the Skyway)

  • 1950 map
  • 1952 map
  • City Linked to Super-Highway, New York Times January 20, 1952 page X17 - map
  • official 1953 renumbering plans - "U. S. 1 Truck: From junction of Route U. S. 1 at west end of Pulaski Skyway, via former Route 25 (Communipaw Avenue) to former Route 1"; calls the Pulaski Skyway just the Pulaski Skyway, however it also leaves out the other 25M (171)
25M
  • Protecting Drawbridges, New York Times January 31, 1937 page 176 - "drawspans on Route 25M, Communipaw Avenue, between Newark and Jersey City"
25T
  • Jersey Renumbered, New York Times December 28, 1952 page X15 - "25-T..US-1--Truck"

info to be added

[edit]

http://www.panynj.gov/doingbusinesswith/seaport/pdfs/cpip/CPIP_Plan/V1_App_B.pdf

Designates 1/9 as "Regionally significant highway facilities"

Has a nicely worded description that "Truck 1/9 continues north to Jersey City, Union City, and North Bergen, and splits in the vicinity of the George Washington Bridge"

Finland 203 (talk) 17:14, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:U.S. Route 1/9 Truck/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Arsenikk (talk) 11:08, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    A few small, things, but nothing a copyedit can't solve.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    You know that you can use the variable "work" for the newspaper in {{cite news}}, making it automatically in italics. The issue that is important, is that the two last references lack a title. I'm not quite sure what the title should be (since I know little about US law), so could you please add them.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    I will pass the article as good, under the condition that the one issue regarding titles for the two refs are fixed up. To be a bit frank, the last paragraph almost seems a bit out-of-place, and I would not complain if the last paragraph (about the definition of a truck) was removed, while it is okay if it remains too. Arsenikk (talk) 11:08, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
After reading it, it did seem very out of place, so I removed it and I fixed the lone ref missing a title. Also, I don't know how to work templates that well, so how do you fix that?Mitch32(The Password is... See here!) 12:33, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations with a good article :) Arsenikk (talk) 23:34, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
What I do with {{cite news}} templates is the following variables: "url" (if online), "title" (title of article), "work" (newspaper or magazine), "last" (last name of author), "first" (first name of author), "author" (full name of author if multiple authors, use instead of last and first), "authorlink" (wikilink to author, only if they have an article on Wikipedia), "pages" (page number if printed edition), "accessdate" (for online newspapers) and "language" (for non-English papers). For the sake of "work", it will automatically put it in italics. Hope that answered the question. Arsenikk (talk) 23:34, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New Vidauct opened Sept 2011

[edit]
  • "Route 1&9T(25)St. Paul's Viaduct Replacement Overview". Construction Updates. NJDOT. March 30, 2009. Retrieved 2011-09-20.
  • Whiton, John (Sep 19th, 2011). "Old Route 1&9 Truck Viaduct Now Closed Forever as Traffic Patterns Shift at Tonnelle". Jersey City Independent. Retrieved 2011-09-20. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  • "New traffic pattern begins tomorrow at Tonnelle Circle in Jersey City", The Jersey Journal, Friday, September 16, 2011, retrieved 2011-09-20 {{citation}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on U.S. Route 1/9 Truck. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:23, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]