Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:Uncommitted (voting option)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 31 March 2024

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. – robertsky (talk) 04:32, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


– Obvious primary topic. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:05, 31 March 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 03:15, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • The article about the voting option has only existed since February 28 this year, and its traffic is clearly going to be very spiky and seasonal. The article also lists a variety of synonyms. It doesn't seem out of the ordinary for readers interested in this to navigate without an expectation of getting short-circuited for one of these terms, as it's a reasonably generic adjective (we also have e.g. a redirect for uncommitted sex). --Joy (talk) 09:18, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose yeah going off what Joy said, its reasonably generic that including (voting option) in the title makes sense User:Sawerchessread (talk) 13:45, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I think we should update Uncommitted's 2024 results in the notable campaigns section to include results of primaries after Super Tuesday

[edit]

My edit "Uncommitted has since earned delegates in Massachusetts, Hawaii, Missouri, Rhode Island, and Kentucky" was reverted without discussion.

I agree that the info box table contains the same information within a comprehensive table that I updated on the page. However, some people are not going to be drawn to the table when looking for an individual state narrative. We should support multiple learning modalities for something as important as months of progress by the uncommitted movement. Many people will likely only read a narrative and not search through tabular data. I believe this information about delegates gained since Super Tuesday is important to be in a narrative format. Smobes (talk) 22:34, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]