This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nursing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Nursing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NursingWikipedia:WikiProject NursingTemplate:WikiProject NursingNursing articles
Oppose a specific device vs category is enough to counter the nom as stated without more reasoning - such as size of articles, SPINOUT etc. Widefox; talk13:28, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Doc James: Regardless of whether an overview page is needed, it still seems reasonable to merge these two non-invasive procedures, which are distinct from the invasive techniques you refer to. The content of just 3 articles (Urinary catheterization, Suprapubic cystostomy and some merged page for UCD and 'external urine collection device') can be adequately linked in the text and through the 'see also' section, if necessary with a brief distinguishing statement. Klbrain (talk) 08:59, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Suggest merge from Stadium buddy, a long-standing unreferenced stub that also seems to be a coatrack for advertising a product. Consolidation, on the basis of short text, context and overlap seems warranted. Klbrain (talk) 09:09, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]