Talk:Value (semiotics)
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
I have begun a gentle process of filling in gaps in the coverage of semiotics. --David91 19:36, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This article reads more as a commentary on the sign in general than on the semiotic notion of value. Most people will probably finish it knowing no more than they did when they began to read it. --Le vin blanc (talk) 22:17, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Do not worry about the image, it will look good once I have entirely rewritten the article. --Le vin blanc (talk) 01:47, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
I have written a little more on value, but the article still needs work. --Le vin blanc (talk) 02:52, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
The "Definition" must not start with: "Drawing from the original definition proposed by Saussure (1857-1913), a sign has two parts:". The only reasonable thing here is a definition of value. /PO —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.94.150.193 (talk) 07:29, 13 September 2008 (UTC)