Talk:Vampire film

Horror High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles

Text and/or other creative content from Vampire film was copied or moved into List of vampire films with this edit on May 7, 2016. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Text and/or other creative content from Vampire film was copied or moved into List of vampire television series with this edit on May 7, 2016. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Fair use rationale for Image:The Vampire Lovers.jpg

Image:The Vampire Lovers.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:41, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move request

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move the page from "Vampire movies" to "Vampire films", per the discussion below. Dekimasu よ! 05:12, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The request is to bring this article's title in line with the naming conventions. - LA @ 16:17, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This move would make the current redirect the article, while this would be the redirect. - LA @ 16:18, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support as per nom.Bssc81 (talk) 07:36, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support from whats in similar categories. Zuiver jo (talk) 21:16, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Image copyright problem with Image:Blood.frostbite.jpg

The image Image:Blood.frostbite.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

The following images also have this problem:

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --20:15, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Splits

Here are two splits to make this article shorter and more readable. LA (T) @ 08:55, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Split Other vampires in films to List of vampire films

It can be specified that there is another list of Dracula films and that this list is for non-Dracula films. LA (T) @ 08:55, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Split Other vampires in television to List of vampire television series

This list should mostly be for series which deal only with vampires, though a section could be devoted to other series with just one or two episodes dealing with vampires. LA (T) @ 08:55, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Aawww, its only 31 kb. Man, vampire was much bigger when we took it to FAC...I am not fond of splitting all of dracs films, so I guess I am not keen on it really :( Casliber (talk · contribs) 09:13, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PS: A better split is to have this as an article, and several list as spinoff lists. Casliber (talk · contribs) 09:26, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please, please don't. I know its a very comprehensive list, and maybe a bit excessive. But it really is a wonderful list. You can't find one even close to that useful anywhere else.Lollipopfop (talk) 03:17, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dracula and his legacy

Isn`t it redundant to have this list of movies and TV appearances and then add a link to 'Dracula in popular culture" which has same list of movies(some might be missing but that`s not the point) in greater detail and other neat stuff. Maybe a short paragraph(which now is present) and a link to mentioned article would be enough? --BlisterD (talk) 16:42, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Justify use of Link?

link between the Universal tradition and the later Hammer style is the 1957 Mexican movie El Vampiro that actually showed the vampire fangs (Lugosi did not) and introduced other now common cliches. In what way is this film- part of a long tradition of Mexican vampire films- a connection between Universal (USA) and Hammer (UK) Dracula films? Is it the ONLY vampire film made in the time period? Nosferatu in 1922 showed fangs - albeit kind of weird rodenty looking ones. Exactly what cliches did it start? Nitpyck (talk) 17:59, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

twilight??

hello?? twilight is like the MOST popular vampire movie right now....there should something a bout twilight for twifans like me!! lol!!! ☆dream on☆dance on☆ 21:15, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's been on the list for nearly two years. -- Gordon Ecker (talk) 02:47, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with that. Its been a definite phenomena. In fact Id like to see vampires in films for the teen to young adult audience mentioned somehow, because it seems like its been the trend. But I have no research to prove anything like that. So, Im not writing it. I did want to say thats the best ever list of vampire films I have ever seen. Lollipopfop (talk) 03:15, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Vampire films. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071121211445/http://www.eclipse.net/~srudy/myths/vampire_myths.html to http://www.eclipse.net/~srudy/myths/vampire_myths.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:49, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]