Talk:Vanikoro flying fox

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Vanikoro flying fox article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Mammals: Bats Low‑importance

	Mammals portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Bats Task Force (assessed as High-importance).

Melanesia: Solomon Islands Low‑importance

	Oceania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Melanesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Melanesia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MelanesiaWikipedia:WikiProject MelanesiaTemplate:WikiProject MelanesiaMelanesia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Solomon Islands (assessed as Low-importance).

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kemulvih. Peer reviewers: Bfiorenzo.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 12:15, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Coments

Each statement of fact in each section of the account should be footnoted with the corresponding reference, please. Also the conservation section should be updated to reveal that the species was sighted in large numbers in 2014 (move that info from the top). DrBuchholz (talk) 16:19, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion: adding an image of the species would be a simple improvement to the article. Association of an image with what’s being stated about the species in the article may benefit the reader. Badoss94 (talk) 22:58, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

This post looks like it is coming along well. I have a few suggestions for you: 1. If possible, you should try to add in a picture so that readers have a visual to go along with the description of the animal. 2. In your description, review the first sentence. It has a few grammatical errors that should be corrected for clarity. Size is only described relative to another species with no physical data given for either one. It would be helpful to include this data and add more physical descriptions. 3. In the behavior section, you could mention some information about this organism's mating behaviors and add in some more content. Hope these suggestions help!

Bfiorenzo (talk) 04:17, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]