Talk:Vault (version control system)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
Cleanup :
- Computer science articles needing attention
- Computer science articles needing expert attention
Copyedit :
- Computing
Expand :
- Computer science
Infobox :
- Computer science articles without infoboxes
Maintain :
- Timeline of computing 2020–present
Photo :
- Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists)
- Computing articles needing images
Stubs :
- Computer science stubs
Unreferenced :
- WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs
Project-related :
- Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

Computing: Software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.

Term "vault"

Doesn't the word "vault" have a more general meaning in computer science than just this single product???? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Aebarschall (talk • contribs) .

Yes, This article is about Vault, the revision control system. Is there anywhere that references Vault as a CS term? McKay 06:13, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

POV article

The article currently currently appears to claim that Vault is an inherently superior replacement to VSS (no source cited), because VSS doesn't support atomic commits (no source cited) as a result of using Microsoft's SQL database (no source cited). Please adhere to the neutral point of view and attribution policies; see also describing points of view.

I haven't read the "citations" (external links), but they were added by a different user from who wrote the article, just to establish notability. The notability policy, however, requires multiple and reliable sources. I don't know who Eric Sink is, but blogs in general are not considered reliable sources. -- intgr 18:20, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On notability: correct, Blogs in general aren't considered reliable sources, but there are numerous exceptions to the rule. For Example. I'd personally put anything on Joel on Software a reliable source, because he's an established writer and journalist, and the blog fits the criteria of a reliable source. Eric Sink's is somewhat the same, but on second look, it appears as if Eric Sink works for sourcegear, and therefore isn't independant, so the issue is moot.

I am having trouble finding more sources, how do we feel about microsoft MVPs? [1] Maybe this article should go the way of the frindle. McKay 14:14, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, also note that I'm totally willing to clean up the article, but I'd hate to do that if the article isn't notable enough to keep around. McKay 14:18, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I've done a lot of searching, and I think I'm willing to support a deletion or a merge at this point. We could avoid an AfD and merge to List of revision control software? McKay 14:23, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I agree. -- intgr ^#%@! 08:59, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]