Talk:Vinča-Belo Brdo

Serbia Top‑importance

	Serbia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cultural Heritage of Serbia (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cultural Heritage of Serbia, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Cultural Heritage of SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject Cultural Heritage of SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject Cultural Heritage of SerbiaCultural Heritage of Serbia articles

Archaeology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Created

Created using material taken from the article Vinca. See there for Version history and authors. Gow 13:56, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

merge

The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Not merged
—

V = I * R

(talk) 06:36, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

One is about one place that happens to be the eponymous site, the other about the Vinca culture. I see no reason for a merger. Gow 13:20, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I too don't see why would they be merged. If anything, they should be split further apart. Nikola (talk) 00:35, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agree per given reasons. Vanjagenije (talk) 10:21, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Images

The Serbian version of this article has some good pictures that appear to be appropriately licensed. I can't navigate the Wikimedia Commons labyrinth myself, but they would be a good addition. —Joseph Roe^Tk•Cb, 16:32, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Excavations of archaeological site in Vinča, c. 1920.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:24, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]