Talk:Virginia Commonwealth University/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions about Virginia Commonwealth University. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

problem with images being of unknown origin

Many of the images are in danger of being deleted, as they were uploaded without clear documentation! I believe that many of the images ARE from fair-use sources; i found one on a vcu website. what can be done about this?

the images that are up show a much older campus, please update as well as give clear documentation, Images should be able to be obtained

Size

The article states a few times that VCU has a student body of 31,000 students. What is the source of that? I checked collegeboard.com, which has it at 25,961, and VCU.edu, which simply states "more than 29,000." Preston 08:03, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

I've had trouble verifying VCU's actual student enrollment myself. The latest number I could find was from 2004, and I know the university has grown since then. It sounds like the 31,000 number is an estimate. --69.255.3.194 15:10, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Official stats from the State of Virginia Council of Higher Education: http://research.schev.edu/enrollment/E2_Report.asp shows VCU with 30,381 students

VCU has a live headcount. http://iserver.adm.vcu.edu/reports/pub/stats/univ.htm

The Fall of 2006 Enrollment is as follows
Undergraduates - 21249 Graduates - 7611 Professional (PhD)- 1592
Total of Fall 2006 - 30452

The Spring 2007 Enrollment is as follows
Undergraduates - 19677 Graduates - 6042 Professional (PhD)- 1574
Total of Spring 2007 - 27293

As you see There is a drop from Fall 2006 to Spring 2007

that being said http://www.news.vcu.edu/vcu_view/pages.aspx?nid=1914
VCU went on those fall headcounts and announced themselves the largest university in Virginia.

-Good catch, but you also have to remember more people are graduating in the fall than people transferring in during spring, so most school have a fairly large drop in enrollment between these two semesters. Hence why it’s the standard to list fall semester enrollment for most schools. --Bvjrm 22:10, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

VCU/MCV naming controversy

It seems this is a hot-button issue, so I thought it would be useful to start a discussion thread on the subject. The way I see it is this: there are two sides to the story, and we should do our best to present both. While MCV students and alumni have obvious emotional reasons to be attached to the MCV name, I think Trani had a valid point in showing how the lack of public awareness of the MCV name since VCU's merger was harming VCU's efforts to gain recognition as a global research university. In any edits that are done to this section I hope to see a balance between these two points of view. I think the section is already pretty biased toward the MCV point of view as it is – most of the section dwells on MCV's "separate identity" without too much of a counterargument for a unified VCU identity. I didn't want to put up a neutrality flag because so far the section is mainly fact-based, but we need to be careful about making the issue too emotionally charged on one side or the other.

--69.255.3.194 15:08, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

"lack of public awareness of the MCV name" ?? If anything it's a lack of awareness of the VCU name, MCV had and still has a great reputation as a medical school, unfortunately there is not a medical residency chair anywhere who knows what or where VCU is. You also miss the fact that the law joining VCU and MCV in 1968 dictated the name as "the Medical College of Virginia at Virginia Commonwealth University". By formally changing that to "VCU Medical Center' Trani broke that law, regardless of your stance on the usefulness of combining the schools under the VCU banner it is an illegal act.

As far as emotionally charged, I think you will find it quite emotionally charged for MCV alums who now no longer have a school, or at least have a school that no longer associates itself with what they consider their history.

The main argument for unifying the schools is monetary saving by shrinking departments and more government funds because one large school gets more money, in my opinion whenever something is being done for money that is the wrong decision. Interestingly, as the article notes, the alumni fund is still run by the MCV Foundation - don't tell the alums we changed the name.

Cry me a river. How do you think RPI alums feel? MCV is very well known in the medical community, I will grant you, but the general public outside of Richmond has never heard of MCV. There is nothing illegal about promoting VCU to the outside world as VCU, and as for your little law, it says it's a college at Virginia Commonwealth University. Note that the university still refers to the campus as the MCV Campus.

The naming controversy has nothing to do with saving money - it is a marketing decision. Nothing is changing about the school's internal workings; only the branding. Instead of two separate schools getting credit in the public eye for doing different things, Trani is making sure that all the university's accomplishments are recognized as one body. The very fact that you view VCU and MCV as separate schools to begin with only lends credence as to why such a move is needed. It is a move that is 38 years overdue. The only reason I am not adding "lack of public awareness" to the article is because I can't find online the results to a survey that showed that most people in Virginia thought MCV was part of the University of Virginia, not VCU.

If nothing else, the "VCU Medical Center" name is common sense. The opinion of every university goes up when it has a medical center (see Johns Hopkins, University of Michigan, et al.). And that's what MCV is: a medical center, at VCU. It's about time that we started calling it for what it is instead of having an emotional attachment to an old name that doesn't make sense in the modern world. But then again, since when has Richmond ever let any of its history get out of the way for a little progress?

--24.125.147.15 07:25, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

MCV predates both RPI and VCU. State law mandated the MCV name. Suites are pending regarding the legality of the name change. I think until it's legally settled, we better remain with both names in use. Digitalblister 04:15, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Trani did nothing illegal; he did not eliminate the name MCV. Take for instance names MCV campus, MCV physicians, MCV hospitals, MCV alumni foundation. The "name change" is also to some extent justified because the university has added some more schools and structures since it received MCV in the VCU charter...the schools of nursing, allied health, pharmacy, dentistry.

It is also important to point out that MCV has never been a stand-alone entity since the formation of VCU, so the name change didn't involve consolidating schools and or changing the chain of command in any way. The name was also to differentiate MCV and VCU Health Systems from the Virginia (UVa) Health Systems; like some else stated the average person presumed MCV is at UVaGoodie2shoes1000 (talk) 05:57, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I'd like to see some cites on the state law mandating the name or on the lawsuits existing and being accepted as valid by a judge. This was a minor issue when the change was first announced, but I haven't heard anyone in the MCV community raise a fuss about it in over a year. Bringing it to the article when the people affected no longer care about it may constitute undue weight. Randy Blackamoor (talk) 20:47, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Problems with faculty section

The problem with the paragraphs in question is that they read more like a history of MCV and the Massey Cancer Center than a listing of notable faculty at VCU. They also have several POV statements without justification or citation, and there are buzzwords throughout ("leading edge," "shake up," etc.). If there are no objections or edits in the next few days or so, I think the remaining paragraphs should be deleted. While these paragraphs are relevant to the history of MCV specifically, the rest of the faculty are notable because they already have articles elsewhere on Wikipedia. --Omaryak 12:30, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

After further research, I've found that the faculty members listed in the article did their primary work at places other than MCV/VCU. They were just passing through. While the faculty listed did perform the first transplants in Virginia, the transplants were not the first in the country, let alone the world. Hume performed the first transplant in the nation at Harvard before coming to MCV. It seems his accomplishment would be better listed over at the Harvard entry. I would welcome trivia like this in the MCV article for those seeking a more detailed history of the institution (with cited sources), but I don't think it belongs in a current listing of notable faculty of VCU. As for the Massey Cancer Center, I would support that information going into a new article about the center itself, but the director does not have information about him available on Wikipedia, so a source was definitely needed there. --Omaryak 21:41, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Omaryak suggests that faculty should only be noteworthy if they have made there accomplishment at the institution in question. If that is the case, then VCU should remove Fenn from its famous faculty ranks because he did his nobel research at Harvard. This of course would be foolish. So, why is it different for the medical faculty? Patrick Sweet, M.D. Wahoowa23

Merging suggestion

It was suggested that the Art Education department wiki page should be merged into VCU's page. I think it is important to keep them separate and to allow the individual departments or schools to have their own identity as constructed through the development of a wiki page about them. Vcu art education 02:50, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Re Department of Art Education - Virginia Commonwealth University

I think merging is the least of the issues involved. The appropriateness (or not) of a university department organising the writing of its own Wikipedia page is being discussed at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard. The current format, in any case, falls well into WP:What Wikipedia is not (i.e. a departmental directory). Tearlach 04:10, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Redirect, full protection

I have redirected Department of Art Education - Virginia Commonwealth University to this parent article, removed some of the advertising language, added appropriate tags, and edit protected the article for one month. Although Wikipedia welcomes appropriate participation, serious violations of WP:COI, WP:NPOV, WP:NOT, WP:SPAM, and WP:OWN exist at this page. It would be out of the question for a university professor to assign students to paste over a paper encyclopedia entry with promotional literature and the same ethical prohibition applies to Wikipedia. I can be contacted via my user talk page (linked through my signature) or via e-mail (linked through my userpage). Durova^Charge! 07:41, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Per communication from the professor I have unprotected this article. University staff and students are encouraged to contribute cited material to this talk page rather than directly to the article. Uninvolved Wikipedia editors can evaluate it and adapt it as appropriate. Wikipedia welcomes and encourages contributions to other areas where conflict of interest is not an issue, such as edits to articles in a field of academic expertise. Durova^Charge! 17:19, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Notable alumni

Some band named VCR are considered "notable alumni"? And listing people who dropped out or transferred after a year doesn't make any sense either. The DMB bassist probably never even went to a class at VCU.

I'm recommending that VCR entry get deleted and that, if you guys want to keep the others in, we change it to "Notable Students" or something more accurate. Leshii 18:27, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, I see Lamb of God is/was Grammy-nominated, which I guess makes them relevant. So I take them out of my recommendation. Leshii 18:29, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Removal of "Activities Section"

I removed the "Activities" sections because it was almost a verbatim repeat of the intro of the sports section. The "Richmond Activities" contained a lot of puffery and was written like an advertisement. Also I know for a fact that the images that were used are copyrighted. Bvjrm (talk) 21:59, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

'Virginia Commonwealth University', not 'Virginia Commonwealth'

As requested by the University, "When referring to the Rams, please use VCU. Virginia Commonwealth University is acceptable when using other institutions full names. Please do not use Va. Commonwealth or Virginia Commonwealth." Opertinicy (talk) 23:23, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Recent news about accepting Philip Morris money

Shouldn't something be included about the recent news that VCU accepts money from the Philip Morris company with the promise to the company that they won't publish research that the company doesn't like? This violates independence of the university in my eyes and that seems a very basic thing to know about a learning community, in my eyes. See the article in the NYTimes from today: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/22/us/22tobacco.html?hp Majesteit (talk) 12:19, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Controversy section

The controvery section appears to be abnormally large in relation to the rest of the article. The section only deals with two issues, but the amount of editing seems to make this a focal point of the university. It is well-sourced, but maybe someone familiar with the issues can trim it down to a paragraph for each issue. If more needs to be stated, then perhaps a standalone article for these controversies would be appropriate. Thanks, Alanraywiki (talk) 15:33, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

I chopped off most of the last section, way too much opinion and too much unfounded conclusion drawing. It gave the impression that VCU's taking money from Phillip Morris is a big secret. That just isn't true; Phillip Morris is one of VCU's biggest benefactors. The problem was nature of this particular deal. The degree section eluded to political conspiracies between Dr Trani, Mayor Wilder, and Mr Monroe that have not been proven. It also gives impression this isn't an problem isolated when it actually is; exceptions were not requested properly. I just stated the facts of each issue and organized the section.Goodie2shoes1000 (talk) 23:33, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Influx of edits

Does anyone know why there is a large influx of editing going on? I don't really see a particular pattern or view. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 03:52, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

http://digg.com/odd_stuff/Why_isn_t_Wikipedia_a_dependable_source_Here_s_why —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.213.10.79 (talk) 20:22, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

As noted above, it appears that some less-than-clever persons were attempting to make a point by vandalizing this article. --ElKevbo (talk) 10:35, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

From what I've gathered from the summary's from recent edits across all of the VCU related pages, it appears that a professor of a freshman orientation course instructed the class to insert something false into the VCU page to demonstrate why Wikipedia is not a proper source to use in a research project. Bvjrm (talk) 17:28, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

If that is the case, I would think the professor could make the point without wasting the time of all the non-VCU editors working hard to keep Wikipedia free of that kind of nonsense. Alanraywiki (talk) 17:45, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

We are sorry for the large, inappropriate influx of edits to the VCU page. You are right, there is a Professor (anonymous, but he does have a weird physical motion when he gets excited about topic; kinda like a little kid holding onto the handle bars of a bumpy rollercoaster, that hasn't taken his ritalin..lol) that made an assignment to add topics about VCU to this Wikipedia page, but he made the assignment with more pure thoughts in mind. We were assigned to read an article, "Know It All; Can Wikipedia conquer expertise?" by Stacy Schiff, and make an edit to our VCU Wikipedia site. Like most societies, there were a few people to test the boundaries; but that's the beauty of freedom and of thought. Although, the influx of posts that caused the "locking" of the VCU wikipedia site, our class (hopefully) learned more about our school than most knew before. It made our class scroll through the site a bit more, learning different things and striking discussions as we went along. Sorry to those that do not attend Virginia Commonwealth University, and Thank You for giving us topics in class! Kingkeerti (talk) 17:07, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

That actually seems more likely. Most of the edits weren't vandalism, just poorly worded or spelled things or unencyclopedic content. That was why I really didn't think the protection was necessary. I've seen articles targeted for vandalism and this is nothing like that. I would rather we had a real chance at encouraging a bunch of new editors here. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 07:31, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

The assignment is over, so I think the article can now be unprotected. Alanraywiki (talk) 17:48, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

VCU Notables

Dr. John B. Fenn - Nobel Prize Winneer for Chemistry 2002 http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/chemistry/laureates/2002/fenn-autobio.html Kingkeerti (talk) 13:18, 22 September 2008 (UTC)keerti ayakannu

Under notable alumni Sam Beam is listed. However under his wikipedia page he is listed as attending Florida State University Film School. Under fsu's page he is listed as notable alumni as well. Can someone look into this...cause I don't really want to. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kkbb087 (talk • contribs) 04:20, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Today I responded to an IP account adding "citation needed" tags in relation to this on this article and Iron & Wine too. I found a magazine article that says that Mr. Beam earned a BFA from VCU, and an MFA from Florida State. As a side note, y'all seem to have actor alumni listed under both Media and Art -- Foetusized (talk) 20:54, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Alumni.

Does going to VCU for only one or two semesters make you an alumni? If not, Christopher Poole should be removed as he didn't graduate from VCU.

~**_mustafarox_**~ (talk) 07:16, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Well the definition of "alumni" are those who attended classes at a school. This does not imply that someone has graduated. For example, at the UVA page they have Georgia O'Keeffe plastered all over as an alum, although she only took one summer course there. Bvjrm (talk) 18:40, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

VCU Department of Health Administration

VCU Department of Health Administration should be merged here. Rd232 ^talk 11:23, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Institute of Medicine Garble

In the Faculty section it states "In the medical field, VCU has had four professors elected to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences' Institute of Medicine". The link to the Institute of Medicine is to the group of that name that has no connection to "American Academy of Arts and Sciences". I suspect the whole mention of "American Academy of Arts and Sciences" is erroneous and should be deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.255.150.13 (talk) 15:57, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

VCU Life Sciences

I added VCU Life Sciences to the list of academic units, as it's not part of any school, but it's own separate division. I know, the name sounds awful 'department of redundancy department', but it reflects the actual organizational name and structure. Joedanger (talk) 15:29, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Proposed merge with VCU expansion

Seems to be an article devoted solely to a period of VCU's recent past, one that is now outdated. Much of it is UNDUE as well. Needs to be woven back into the main article. p b p 13:54, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

Disagree with Merge - I think the expansion started under Eugene Trani and this history 1990-present should be included. Maybe this could become a history of VCU expansion article or something. Peace and GoRamsGo, MPS (talk) 17:10, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
Agree with Merge - This is an integral part of the presentation of the university. No need to fragment the article giving undue importance to one aspect. Better as a distinct section in the main page. werldwayd (talk) 22:03, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 8 external links on Virginia Commonwealth University. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:28, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Virginia Commonwealth University. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:53, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Images

Hey User:Bradford9, I noticed you've been adding quite a few images to the article. I think these images should not be added, as WP:IMGCONTENT says that images are meant to increase understanding of an article, which is not the case with some of the images. Please reply. Sungodtemple a tcg fan!!1 !11 !! (talk) 15:20, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Unnecessarily detailed listing of alumni

@Bradford9: Please don't copy the contents of List of Virginia Commonwealth University alumni into this article. It's completely unnecessary. ElKevbo (talk) 15:55, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

ERB-courtyard.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:48, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Malformatted images

@Sloop101: Why have you repeatedly edit-warred to misformat images in this article in complete contradiction to our guidelines about images? You haven't used any edit summaries or replied to messages in your User Talk page. If you continue doing this, you will likely be blocked. ElKevbo (talk) 00:55, 25 June 2021 (UTC)