Talk:Voere VEC-91

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Voere VEC-91 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Austria Low‑importance

	Austria portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Austria, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles about Austria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.AustriaWikipedia:WikiProject AustriaTemplate:WikiProject AustriaAustria articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	It is requested that an image or images be included in this article to improve its quality.

Firearms Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

One thing I've read about caseless ammunition is that they're quite fragile compared to conventional rounds, requiring feed systems like the G11's top-mounted magazine. But the VEC-91 seems to use a more conventional bolt action, which, as I understand it, should run the risk of damaging the round as it's loaded, or make it more difficult to extract a failed or unfired round. It would be interesting to see more information on how it avoids this.--31.98.10.55 (talk) 08:58, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]