Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:Wells Gray-Clearwater volcanic field

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleWells Gray-Clearwater volcanic field has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 19, 2008Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 23, 2008.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that some lava flows at the Wells Gray-Clearwater volcanic field in British Columbia, Canada include unique, small, green nodules that come from the mantle?

req adjustment

[edit]
The Wells Gray-Clearwater Volcanic Field is one of the top 10 volcanic areas in Canada with recent seismic activity, the others include: Castle Rock, Mount Edziza, Mount Cayley, Hoodoo Mountain, Lava Fork Valley, Crow Lagoon, Mount Silverthrone, Mount Meager and Mount Garibaldi.

Just for consistency, could you adjust that so that the equivalent "fields" are paralleled, rather than individiual mountains; I realize that makes four of them all one Volcanic Field (Garibaldi, or Arc or Belt or whatever it is); the idea is to pivot off the word "area"; Meager is not an area, it's a mountain; likewise the others. Just a question of language/structure.Skookum1 23:09, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Wells Gray-Clearwater volcanic field/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nice intro: clear, concise and to the point. Lead paragraph is well referenced and contains sufficient internal links. The geology section is likewise: all points are referenced, it is free from gramatical errors, there is great use of images and a diagram. The information about current volcanic activity in the area is both interesting and informative. The section on monitoring is also good. The list of notable vents is a useful addition, as it leads the reader to other articles related to the subject. Well categorized. All-in-all, this is an excellent article and meets all of the Good Article criteria. J.T Pearson 08:24, 19 August 2008 (UTC)