Talk:Window blind

	Some Window Blinds
	There are several kinds of window blind.; They all shade the room from the sun.

Glass Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Glass, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of glass on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GlassWikipedia:WikiProject Physics/Taskforces/GlassTemplate:WikiProject Glassglass articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Home Living Low‑importance

	Housing portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Home Living, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of home-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Home LivingWikipedia:WikiProject Home LivingTemplate:WikiProject Home Livinghome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Link to comercial site

Theres a link to a site selling window-blinds at the bottom of this article. Someone should probably remove it? --109.58.193.191 (talk) 13:48, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done Wikipelli ^Talk 13:50, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There are some more links (spam). For some reason, I can't remove them.--Stoneybologni (talk) 17:50, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mini blind

I added Mini blind to see also. I spent quite some time working on it. According to my research ‘window blind’ refers to all kinds of window blinds and ‘mini blind’ refers only to mini blinds. There’s plenty of room on Wikipedia for Mini blind to be worked on. I put see also 'Window blind' on that article to direct people to this article, since I had never heard the term 'Window blind' before I started researching 'mini blind'. --Chuck Marean 03:19, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

These should be MERGED. Most of what you write at MINI BLIND is TRIVIAL, REDUNDANT, and more appropriate HERE.

They shouldn't be. They are two different words with two different meanings. To give enough about Mini blind it should have a separate article. --Chuck Marean 15:50, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A mini blind is merley a SUBSET of the larger and more meaningful category fo WINDOW BLINDS. 71.234.194.80 04:19, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

REALLY, folks, there's NO NEED for a entirely SEPARATE article on mini blind. SILLY.71.234.194.80 11:21, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The key question is how much of the historical & background content now at mini blind is truly unique and specific to that particular form, versus window blinds in general. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 22:37, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Window blind is a category of things including mini blind. Separate articles inspire people work on those articles and find info for them, and they show up in Google. Chuck Marean 17:01, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Origin of Venetian blinds

I've heard, probably in at least two places, that Venetian blinds (despite the name) are actually of Japanese origin. Does anybody know of a source to support or oppose this claim? -- Smjg 17:16, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox window covering

I made Infobox window covering for this page and others.

Chuck Marean 02:30, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

IMO, this is not an Infobox, but merely a decorated framing & caption of an image, and as such, seems quite superfluous. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 20:31, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It aligns to the right. The info it gives is: name of object, picture of object, caption and whatever references are appended to the caption. It has a resemblance to a window with curtains and a shade because it’s for articles about on such things. It’s really no more superfluous than the main page, and other portals, etc. What hues it should be, I’m not sure. It was Halloween. Here’s another setting:

{{Infobox window covering|name= Window Blinds
|image= 197292 2587catblindsVertigone.jpg
|image size= 181px|caption= Cat tangled in miniblinds
|drapecolor= #ccccff|shadecolor= #ccccff}}

--Chuck Marean 21:28, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please familiarize yourself with Help:Infobox, especially the introductory description: "An infobox on Wikipedia is a consistently-formatted table which is present in articles with a common subject to provide summary information consistently between articles or improve navigation to closely related articles in that subject." Your "infobox" does none of this - it merely is a colorful framing of an image that is apparently supposed to resemble a window with curtains (which is clever, but not encyclopedic). I kept the image and caption you included, but the Halloween-themed fluff is superfluous. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 21:32, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I already read it. This is an infobox. You just claimed it "does none of this." Yet, it's consistent. It's a table. It's for articles with a common subject. It's to provide summary information consistently in those articles. It can be navigation to it's reference. I've read about infoboxes extensively. The above color is for the technology boxes, but keeping box colors the same is a minor opinion on Wikipedia. The fact is, the thum image is also an infobox. It's a box and it contains information. I admit I like this infobox because I helped design it. It has color parameters so a consensus can form about what color it should be in what articles. The halloween colors on this talk page were not ment to be the colors used in articles. Again, the picture frame is ment for articles about shades and curtains. It's somewhat adaptable. The caption could have the toc for example, or it could eventually be made into a nav box. It could be like a taxobox, if someone knows how to classify the various things. Actually, I think the subject of the picture's caption should be window blinds Chuck Marean 04:35, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, this is not an Infobox. It neither provides summary information consistently between articles nor improves navigation to closely related articles on this subject. Furthermore, because of this, and because of the original design, it is not consistent with Infoboxes on other articles or Wikipedia in general. Plus, the design is too informal. Common sense says that tables in encyclopedias should strive to be formal. --216.165.32.47 (talk) 00:48, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits

While I appreciate User:Chuck Marean's enthusiasm, I fear many of his edits are either oversimplifications (this isn't Simple English Wikipedia), redundant (much of the introductory text he added was already stated), or simply unencyclopedic. I've restored the intro section, and moved the (cute) cat image to the gallery, as it is not very illustrative to be a lead image. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 05:27, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Again, Chuck, much of your contributions are redundant to the existing text. I'm sure you're proud of your research, but sometimes the article already states what you've added. Please take greater care. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 21:39, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chuck, explain to me how this edit doesn't merely introduce redundant material. Just 'cause you looked it up in a dictionary doesn't mean it should be added here. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 17:44, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Again, Chuck, just because what you added might be "clear and accurate" doesn't mean it is appropriate to include. The article seemed quite sufficiently clear and accurate before you started adding simple and redundant dictionary definitions. I have not reverted these since I don't want to get into a 3RR situation, but please engage in discussion. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 14:38, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Third Opinion

The dictionary definitions should really be integrated into the main body of the article. Instead of adding content which is repeated with slight variations of phrasing consider rephrasing the existing content and adding the sources - this might be more beneficial, as would adding sources for unsourced statements (I'll flag some up). Consider listing at [Category:Wikipedia_articles_needing_copy_edit] by adding {{Copyedit}} to the top of the page. Finally, an illustration for each of the types of blinds would be a great addition. --Davémon 19:31, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fact & Who

Three comments:

I think " . . . old technology." and "Drawings in ancient Egyptian tombs of reed blinds have been reported . . ." are from Tweeddale, David, Blinds and Roller Shades, 2007, U.S.A.
"An awning is considered a blind" is obviously from Gove, Philip, Ph.D., Webster’s Third New International Dictionary of the English Language, 1961, G. & C. Merriam Company, Springfield, Massachusetts, U.S.A. and/or Pearsall, Judy, Concise Oxford English Dictionary, 2002, Oxford University Press, Inc., New York.
"Venetian blinds were introduced around 1770, possibly in Venice, Italy" is probably from the Unabridged OED which gives dates and points out that the word Venetian means Venice, Italy. Yet, in my opinion Venetian sounds similar to Phoenician, a person from coastal lands in Syria during pre-Christian times. Why wouldn't they have been invented in some year BCE? Even today, they are sometimes made of wood.

Chuck Marean 18:48, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

gallery

Bigger version of the gallery, but I suppose it’s alright the way it is:

File:197292 2587catblindsVertigone.jpg

A cat playing in a window blind

File:189600 5558PleatedShadeAkkia.jpg

Close-up of a pleated shade

Chuck Marean 18:48, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Types and sagging

I put the Types section contributed by Paleologo & Tra before the Automobile blinds section. Also, I paraphrased the paragraph on sagging horizontal blinds somebody wrote. I put it right before the first vertical blinds paragraph. Chuck Marean 21:40, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

History mystery

Just saw a TV movie from 1984 about George Washington which showed venetian blinds. Is that yet another goof by set designers, or could colonial America have had venetian blinds? Shenme (talk) 00:33, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure, but venetian blinds aren't exactly the pentacle of modern technology. They're just slats of material with a little pulley system. --IronMaidenRocks (talk) 01:57, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Umm Bopp leads to a dead end

No info on Sun Vertical patent anywhere online, so perhaps there is a researcher with access. The John Hampson 1841 patent is available, but not included?

RE : Colonial blinds -- they were in use all over France by the late 1600's -- uncertain where the first appeared in colonies, but examples abound by 1760. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.230.117.131 (talk) 18:44, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Venetian Blinds

It is interesting how the rotating bar or wand that is used to open, close and rotate the slates is not even mentioned in the Venetian Blinds section. Come on people. --ProofMaster (talk) 14:49, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits

I think that last changes that I made are absolutely OK in section where I created content. Why is reverted? Is there any good reason for it?

MilanBgd (talk) 16:14, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations + close paraphrasing
Reference links to an online store.
Wikipedia is not an instruction manual

-KH-1 (talk) 08:30, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Venetian vs Persian blinds

From the way the article is written, I can't tell the difference between Venetian and Persian blinds. Could somebody please clarify? --98.235.110.117 (talk) 15:42, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

From what I have gathered, there doesn't seem to be any solid difference between the two besides the name. Octacle (talk) 08:24, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe there is no difference, but the format of the article implies that they are different -- different sections and headings, one after the other. It is confusing. Would be helpful to clarify. AtomAnt (talk) 15:38, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Google: "Venetian blinds": 5.2mln; "Persian blinds": 68k I've never heard of "Persian blinds". 85.193.247.94 (talk) 21:38, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Latest revision to Venetian Blinds section

I don't know enough to edit the last paragraph of the Venetian blinds section (about Venetian blinds that are inside windows), but there are at least six typos and no information about who the "some companies" are who "reinvented" Venetian blinds or when this happened, nor is there information about what is meant by "damaging and fouling." There are also no references. I hope someone who knows something about it can fix it. If not, I think it is probably bad enough that it should be removed. FideliaE (talk) 18:43, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Roman Blinds

In this section, the last line says

Unlike other blinds such as roller, vertical, and Venetian blinds, Romans offer 
no option to protect against high temperatures or moisture, making them unsuitable 
for bathrooms.

I am completely unable to determine what this is trying to say. Can someone with more knowledge than I expand on this, and perhaps provide a citation?

*Septegram*Talk*Contributions* 00:21, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

AcropolisMuseumShading.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:13, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Vehicle Blinds

I'm proposing that we remove the Vehicle blinds section. While it's true that vehicles can include blinds for car windows, it's not in-line with the rest of the article which is referring to interior windows and doors. It seems unlikely that people would look to look for car window blinds on this page, and if they did, the rest of the content wouldn't be appropriate. Open to a discussion on why it should be kept, otherwise I will likely remove the content. - Rowan-MMB — Preceding undated comment added 19:38, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Roman shade

Merging Roman shade here to remove an unnecessary stub. Rowan-MMB (talk) 19:57, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cellular shades

Merging Cellular shades here to remove an unnecessary stub. Rowan-MMB (talk) 08:11, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]