Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:Yaanga/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ezlev (talk · contribs) 00:03, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


I'll be reviewing this fascinating article! I've created two subsections below, one for {{GAProgress}} as an overview of the review's status and one for specific points to be raised and discussed. Any broader discussion can take place up here. Looking forward to working with you, Vizjim! ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) 00:03, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vizjim, the work you've done looks great! Is the article ready for me to take another look? ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) 23:09, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ezlev, thanks so much for your patience! I think I've dealt with the main points you raised now, so yes please take a look and advise.Vizjim (talk) 19:34, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
As far as I'm concerned, Vizjim, this is a Good Article! Congrats! ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) 18:49, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Progress

[edit]
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Notes

[edit]

Well written

[edit]

Prose: Well done overall!

  • The third paragraph of the "Location" section needs to be shortened and clarified.
    • Done
  • The article's conclusion is particularly well done – good job!

MOS: Needs some work to follow MOS:LEDE.

  • Citations in the lede should be moved into the body where possible, as should content from the lede.
    • Done
  • The lede should summarize the body of the article.
    • Done
  • Other MOS criteria for GA are met.

Verifiable

[edit]

Reference style: Good! Reliable sources: Sourcing looks good. No original research:

  • The section beginning "The river continued to flow westward to Ballona Flats" and ending "north of present Boyle Heights" is unsourced.
    • Done

Free of copyvio:

  • Earwig flags one WP:MIRROR, which isn't a problem.
  • Some of the long quotes from this source need to be incorporated into the text.
    • Done

Broad

[edit]

Addresses main aspects: Looks like it! Stays focused: It does!

Neutral

[edit]

Seems to neutrally reflect the sources.

Stable

[edit]

It is!

Illustrated

[edit]

Yep!

Final points

[edit]

This looks fantastic, Vizjim. A few final details:

  • The sentence "More than one history of Los Angeles makes claims that in the westward shift of the river in the flood of 1815, the river destroyed both the Natives' village as well as the recently established second pueblo settlement, including the pueblo chapel." Is this actually sourced to the ayuntamiento records, or does it need a citation to a different source for support?
  • I found a citation in Union Station (Los Angeles) for the Bernice Johnston quote and added it here, but it's incomplete – any chance you've got a link to the source, or more details about it?

Just let me know one way or the other about these two things, and we'll be good to go! ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) 01:45, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]