Template:Did you know nominations/Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. (season 2)
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:12, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. (season 2)
[edit]( )
- ... that the second season of the television series Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. introduced the Inhumans race to the Marvel Cinematic Universe ahead of their own film?
Improved to Good Article status by Adamstom.97 (talk) and Favre1fan93 (talk). Nominated by Adamstom.97 (talk) at 01:45, 9 July 2015 (UTC).
Recently promoted to GA status, well written, within policy, hook's interested, just need a QPQ done to finish the review. Thanks. --Captain Assassin! «T ♦ C ♦ G» 15:14, 9 July 2015 (UTC)- The nominator is presently exempt from the QPQ review requirement, as they have only created two DYK nominations, as per QPQ check results. Article promoted to GA status on 8 July 2015. Checks for copyvio reveals no problems (e.g. Earwig copyvio results, in which the only "red flags" are content that is properly quoted in the article). A problem is that, unless I am missing something, I'm not seeing in the article where content of the hook is present or sourced with an inline citation to a reliable source. For example, the following sources in the references section about the Inhumans do not state this: [1], [2], [3]. North America1000 16:09, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
- This source, currently reference 56 in the article, contains the information. - adamstom97 (talk) 21:53, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
- @Adamstom.97: Thanks for the reply. I still cannot find in the article where content of the hook is present, though. Both sentences in the article cited with the source do not state this. North America1000 23:36, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
- I believe I have now rectified that. - adamstom97 (talk) 03:02, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
- @Adamstom.97: Thanks for the reply. I still cannot find in the article where content of the hook is present, though. Both sentences in the article cited with the source do not state this. North America1000 23:36, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
- This source, currently reference 56 in the article, contains the information. - adamstom97 (talk) 21:53, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
Good to go. Content of the hook is now present in the article, and is backed with an inline citation to a reliable source. North America1000 03:27, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
